My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/04/2006 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
01/04/2006 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2022 5:02:27 PM
Creation date
1/25/2022 9:31:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/04/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> have been released., and the security has been returned to <br /> the developer. <br /> Recap of Discussion: Strengthen the existing Bylaw, <br /> Educate Public, Enforcement and Maintenance. <br /> r. Rowley informed the Board of the current Federal <br /> regulation regarding any project of one acre or more is <br /> required to file a Rational Pollution Discharge Elimination <br /> Systems PDES) permit application. This could apply t <br /> the clearing, of up to one acre of a single-family lot . <br /> Growth Mnagement Zoning Bylaw - development rate <br /> and relations to availability of adequate wastewater <br /> inf-rastructure and nutrient impacts. <br /> The Chairman suggested it might be premature t <br /> address this matter at this point; to which the Board <br /> agred. <br /> #5 Water Quality Report Zoning -Bylaw - The Town <br /> Planner suggested this bylaw is outdated and volunteered to <br /> begin to review and update this information. <br /> a shpee River and Qua shnet River Protective <br /> District Zoning Bylaw - The Town Planner suggested this <br /> Bylaw be expanded to cover a larger area, including the <br /> Charles and santuit Fivers as well as some of the ponds . <br /> There is no reap indicating those areas currently protected, <br /> the determination is made by a distance from a bank of the <br /> stream. <br /> The hair'nan requested a designation of protected <br /> areas be provided for clarity. <br /> Mr. Rowley made reference to the Rivers Prot <br /> requ-irement of protective distance of Zoo feet from the <br /> bank. <br /> The Torn Planner suggested it might be beneficial for <br /> the Conservation Commission to adopt these regulations, as <br /> they are not subject to grandfathering. <br /> It was agreed that the Planning Board/staff would <br /> research the Rivers Act information ation prior to a discussion <br /> with the Conservation commission Agent . <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.