Laserfiche WebLink
.2 Minimum Frontage - Flexibility should be <br /> preserved, with a zoning requirement providing the Planning <br /> Board the option to waive. Or, consideration of <br /> eliminating the frontage requirements in favor of a lot <br /> shape or minimum radius factor. <br /> 05. 3 Lot Shape - Again, this would allow flexibility, <br /> along with a 20 ft. minimum. <br /> 05. 5 Required Open Space - Possible increase of the <br /> current 3 requirement . There are also bonus point <br /> possibilities to be considered. <br /> Permissible Uses of Open Space <br /> 0 . 1 Purposes - The Planning Board currently requires <br /> to of any open space remain in its natural state. <br /> Allowances for flexibility should be considered. <br /> 06. 2 Recreation Lands - Not applicable. <br /> (The consulting Engineer arrived at the Meeting at <br /> this point, : 40 p.m. ) <br /> 06. 3 Leaching Facilities - Areas set aside for natural <br /> drainage within subdivisions would depend upon the <br /> character of the depression of a particular area . <br /> Allowances should be made for discharge purposes. <br /> The consulting Engineer explained there are certain <br /> legal components involved in a common/shared septic system <br /> allowed under Title V, should- be referenced to the Board of <br /> Health with -regard to maintenance by lot owners . <br /> 06. 4 Accessory Structures - Deleted. <br /> Ownership of Open Space <br /> 07 . 1 . 3 Open Space Maintenance - Suggestion that the <br /> Developer be responsible for maintenance of open space, if <br /> it is not conve ed' t the Town/Land Trust. <br /> 07 . 2 Permanent Restriction - This is mandatary under <br /> the current Zoning Bylaw. <br /> 07 . 3 Encumbrances. - This section to be included. <br /> 7 <br />