My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/06/2002 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
03/06/2002 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2022 10:36:50 AM
Creation date
1/25/2022 2:36:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/06/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
llashpee Planning Board <br /> March 6, 2002 <br /> Minutes <br /> Members Present: Beverly lane, Dick Terry, Steve Dolan, Dennis Eal arini <br /> Others Present: Torn Fudala, Torun Planner, Eric Smith, Assistant Town Planner; <br /> leila Stevens, Planning Board Secretary <br /> Applicant: Duel a Bryant/Paul Averett <br /> Location: Hest side ofGreat-Neck Road d North; Map 52, Blocks 2 & fit <br /> Request: Approval of Definitive Plan. Filed February 6, 2002p <br /> Attorney J ose h Maruca p r vided copies,of documents with a history'of the project. He <br /> explained how the parcel of land was purchased in 1 Dulce Bryant. Mr. Bryant <br /> '1981, willing a portion of land to a famoll friend. When this friend died, the land <br /> died �n w g .. . . <br /> was purchased b the son of the deceased. It was lamer found out than a subdivision was <br /> p <br /> created without previous Board approval. He is seeking approval of a definitive <br /> subdivision plan with waivers. Om�(%Y <br /> Dennisad a question about who Iry paying takes on the land. Atty. Maruca said there <br /> have always been two to hills out to the two different owners. The propel had <br /> been divided according t . Dulce' will. He said there had already been a variance <br /> issued. He said that he is re in iaivers because it doesn't conform to current <br /> zoning laws. <br /> Paul Averett had a question about the waiver in regards to lot size. He expressed <br /> concerns about driveway footage and said that he ,nay.have trouble building a house. <br /> Several abutters were present. They had concerns about other abutters not being <br /> notified and also about a big subdivision going up. <br /> Brian Garner Attorney for buyer, Mr. lose: said that his client wanted to put a house <br /> and a barn <br /> n the land and that he wanted the same rights as every other owner. He did <br /> not fee <br /> that Mr. Rose should have any permanent restrictions placed on his land. <br /> Tom F u <br /> Bala explained that a waiver was granted for one lot only and now the atto Bey <br /> is suggest <br /> in other possible ideas for the land. There was a lengthy discussion about <br /> the retractie v -endorsement. Atto rn ey Maruca requested that the Planning Board act on <br /> this. <br /> Motion by � g <br /> Steve to accept the eight waivers as presented on Attorney Maruca's list. <br /> Seconded by Beverly: unarrirnous. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.