Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> The Town Planner provided a copy of a letter dated October, <br /> 1974, signed by Earl Marsters, Chairman of the Planning Board, <br /> releasing the bond, Sandlewood Subdivision, owned by New Seabury <br /> Corporation, acknowledging all necessary construction is in <br /> compliance with Subdivision rules and regulations and has been <br /> satisfactorily completed. <br /> It was the consensus of the Board to advise Applicant to <br /> approach the owner and bring this matter to their attention <br /> asking them to take responsibility- for a resolution to this <br /> drainage issue; and to then communicate back to the Board. (This <br /> matter concluded at p.m. ) <br /> Special Permit Site Plan Review <br /> uashnet East Condominium Association - Attorney Robert Dills <br /> The Cha irman recognized John Michaels, who informed the <br /> Board that Zoning Board of Appeals BA has approved a plan <br /> prepared by Baxter & Nye, nose to nose parking with guardrail <br /> along the back (all as recommended by the Planning Board) . Plan <br /> entitled, "Lowell Road, 1ashpee, MA, Proposed Parking Expansion <br /> Plan - " . <br /> The Chairman recognized Thomas Cooke, who asked the Board if <br /> the approved plans would have to be adhered to. The Board <br /> responded, "Yes" . He expressed concern regarding. tie buffer <br /> area, uncertain as to whether or not monies to complete the <br /> project could be raised $ , e was advised that any <br /> change to the approved plan would require modification approval. <br /> Mr. Rowley clarified the plan expands beyond improvement to <br /> an existing drainage situation, as it also addresses drainage of <br /> the proposed parking area. He stated the proposed plan is <br /> acceptable, noting the drainage and paving improvements. <br /> The Town Planner stated his dismay with the destruction of <br /> buffer area, disagreeing with setting this type of a precedent . <br /> The Chairman stated, for the Record, that the previous <br /> statement has been recognized and noted by the Board, that it is <br /> not the intention of the Board to set a precedent, but rather to <br /> remedy a difficult situation. <br /> Attorney bills offered to provide copies of the pending <br /> Decision. <br /> Thomas Cooke stated his opposition to destroying any of the <br /> buffer area. <br /> There being no further Board discussion, the Chairman <br /> entertained a► motion. <br /> � _ <br />