Laserfiche WebLink
Other changes include increasing the number of plan copies <br /> for the permanent record to two 2 . advertising, Fire Department <br /> access, detailed drawing requirements have been deleted, <br /> stor water management has been deleted—references to be made to <br /> the Zoning By-law and the word "variances" be deleted, the word <br /> "waiver" remaining. <br /> MTIg :: Dennis B l ari i made a Motion to ClOBethe Public <br /> Hearing in this matter; which Motion was seconded by Steve Bolan <br /> and so voted unanimously. <br /> There being no further Board discussion regarding Special <br /> Permit Regulations, the Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> NQTI N: Richard 'Terry made a lotion to approve the Special <br /> Permit Regulations as amended on the August 21, 2002 draft; which <br /> Motion was seconded by Don Myers and so voted unanimously. <br /> Y <br /> Discussion - Proposed Articles Submitted- for Town Meeting <br /> Richard Terry feels that the Planning Board should have <br /> received some notice that the Board of Selectmen were <br /> contemplating a rejection of the proposed Articles, which would <br /> have prodded the Planning Board benefit of subxtmi s s i on b <br /> Petition. <br /> He volunteered to compose a letter to 'Town Counsel <br /> requesting a decision/opinion in writing. <br /> The Town Planner reported that the Assistant Planner <br /> offered an explanation of the Affordable Housing Article <br /> at the Selectmen' s Meeting. There was great opposition to the <br /> dormitory issue. The Assistant Planner suggested the Article be <br /> amended to remove mention of dormitory housing, be replaced <br /> with housing un-its only, which suggestion was denied based on the <br /> objection raised that employment opportunities should be provided <br /> for residents rather <br /> than subsidizing business. <br /> When asked by the Town Planner if the Board of Selectmen <br /> would support an.Article for Affordable Housing t be provided b <br /> employers (not l�.. Ited to employees) , the indication was <br /> positive. There was also indication that there would be <br /> reconsideration of Articles prior to the May Town Meeting. <br /> Where was some discussion regarding future submission of <br /> proposed Planning Board Articles by Petition. <br /> The 'Town Planner commented that in the past the Planning <br /> Board had alwaysbeen <br /> grateful for the courtesy of having their <br /> proposed Articles approved for inclusion on the Town Meeting <br /> Warrant . <br /> Planning Board Members were upset that they were not allowed <br /> � _ <br />