My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/02/2002 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
10/02/2002 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2022 11:10:37 AM
Creation date
1/26/2022 11:03:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/02/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
He commented that the standard of lining is being threatened <br />by traffic and safety concerns, as well as noise, water, and <br />light pollution. <br />He urged the Planning Board to support this proposed Article <br />that was originally written by then in order to rectify past <br />zoning mistakes and to bring the zoning By-laws into conformance <br />with the Comprehensive Plan. He stated this is the only <br />opportunity to do so, once a building is constructed it remains <br />permanent. <br />The opponents of change have a crested interest i <br />maintaining the current zoning which is completely and selfishly <br />money oriented. A windfall profit will be realized it the <br />current zoning remains in place. <br />In conclusion, Imo'. Benjamin asked for Planning Board support <br />in order to change the zoning By-laws. <br />Linda Pletcher, 28 Linden - Clarified that the Article <br />previously presented did not fail., but rather was indefinitely <br />postponed. She took offense to the use of words such as <br />"collusion". <br />She expressed her hope that the Planning Board has an astute <br />understanding of the proposed Article. The Article was very well <br />publicized two years ago. She spoke to Town Hall mishaps and <br />misplaced paperwork resulting in the inability to properly submit <br />and discuss the Article. <br />Her point being that this is not the first time this Article <br />has been presented; that the citizens of the Town were interested <br />in implementing the Comprehensive Plan two years ago. The future <br />of the Town has to begin at some point. The Planning Board, some <br />six to eight years ago were interested in planning the future of <br />the Town. <br />She made the point that the easiest way to defeat any zoning <br />article is to label it "too complicated" "too difficult". she <br />stated the Article being proposed is not complicated, it simply <br />has to be read. The Article is lengthy, precise, and correct. <br />Planning Board language was used in preparing the Article, the <br />Comprehensive Plan was voted long before the Southport project <br />was completed. <br />This proposal is the right thing for the Town, it should be <br />zoned residential in order to limit traffic and visibility. An <br />attempt is being made to cooperate between residents and <br />business. <br />She urged the Planning Board to include this proposal into <br />their vision for the Town, as was voted six to eight years ago. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.