Laserfiche WebLink
runnin through the center. Lot l0 has frontage on old ronta <br /> g g g <br /> Barnstable Road. Attorney McLaughlin made reference to a letter <br /> previously written by Attorney Doneski as it referred to release �� ��' <br /> of said Lot 102 . Attorney McLaughlin has interpreted Attorney <br /> 1 5 <br /> Doneskils letter to mean that it is within the Planning Board' s <br /> discretion to make a determination as to Release of covenant for �,t� <br /> Lots 103 and 113, provided a temporary gravel road be constructed " <br /> to the rear lot lines of said two lots. <br /> Ile <br /> Attorney McLaughlin requested approval of driveway access 14 <br /> for Lots 103 and 113 off Kristina Lane, construction of a <br /> H <br /> is temporary gravel road, which would enable the three lots to be <br /> built and sold, which would create the funds necessary to finish ' <br /> the road. <br /> The chairman inquired how the temporary road would address <br /> turn around space (fire apparatus) . Attorney McLaughlin stated <br /> the road would not be designed with a turn around radius area. <br /> (References were being made to the Plan at this point, ) � 1 <br /> Mr. Rowley commented that if the temporary road/driveway <br /> were to be constructed subject to the Subdivision Rules and Regs t <br /> for a limited length of time would be appropriate; a narrow path 4 <br /> wide enough for one car is not sufficient. He further cautioned PR <br /> ! <br /> the Board that the integrity of old Barnstable Road should be <br /> maintained, requiring a temporary apron and other considerations r ,"4 <br /> be included in the .ro osal <br /> p p <br /> John Kuchinskl expressed a preference for pavement rather <br /> than gravel. <br /> Ip � <br /> The chairman reiterated a safety concern regarding Lot 3 . <br /> *p <br /> Attorney McLaughlin suggested a Sight Requirement be <br /> required. In the alternative, the Chairman suggested the <br /> gg <br /> proposed easement across Lot 2 which would eliminate sight <br /> issues from Lot 3 . The chairman determined a number of legal <br /> g <br /> issues have been raised regarding this matter, which has proven ! rt <br /> to be complicated, the Board has expressed a consistent position k. <br /> of concern for public safety issues and has asked that the lots '' <br /> not have individual drivewayaccess onto a n � 4� <br /> dangerous curve. He <br /> stated his understanding that the original agreement between the : <br /> Board and Applicant was for an easement across Lot 103 to Lot <br /> pP <br /> 102 . �11� <br /> After lengthy discussion, Attorney McLaughlin proposed , <br /> obtaining Releases for the three lots under discussion, increase <br /> the depth of the line of sight easement, after which a Lot <br /> Release Agreement could be drawn stating the remainder of they <br /> lots are to be released upon completion of the road. <br /> The chairman responded this is considered to be the normal " <br /> 4 <br /> course of events. However, there being so many questions + <br /> _4_ r ! <br /> .., <br />