My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/01/1998 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
04/01/1998 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2022 5:01:36 PM
Creation date
1/27/2022 1:38:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/01/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
}i <br /> 41t <br /> fII <br /> Planner. Eric Smith had attemptedwithin <br /> p to do that the coastal og <br /> 7 Resources Element of the Plan. <br /> Rfl <br /> The Town Planner explained to the commission M <br /> embers that <br /> Mashpee had formulated a Coastal Resource Management ' <br /> g t committee, <br /> and that specific Votes were taken on the , <br /> language of the Goals <br /> ` and objectives. The committee further chose to remove some of ,.. <br /> the Regional Policy Plan language, which now makes i _ <br /> t very <br /> difficult to contradict the Votes of the very people <br /> on and are in support of t who worked <br /> pp he Plan. (There was some discussion at <br /> this point and specific examples were given. ) <br /> Ms. Fenn suggested a variance provision <br /> p s z on could be provided <br /> for certain regulations. There was discussion regarding <br /> properties located within V-Zon <br /> e s. Ms. Fenn commented upon <br /> situations were a property is only partially within thin �� _ <br /> which means you would have to-build y a V'-Zone� <br /> y to build outside of the V-Zone. vain. <br /> - ,t1. <br /> The Town Planner agreed this language was re ferabl <br /> prohibiting all development within v-Zones preferable to <br /> . ,. <br /> Ms. Fenn stated the intention of a large number of Policies <br /> is to address expansion of existing uses. <br /> ti=rf r, <br /> The Chairman acknowledge this Element of the Plan had <br /> been <br /> submitted knowing it was non-com liant but t close. This Element 1,s, <br /> incorporated the most citizen input, scrutiny, 4 p utiny, thought and <br /> effort <br /> v <br /> The Town Planner commented upon the intense political <br /> interest of this Element, p cal <br /> _1 <br /> The Town Planner asked if there were any Commission comments <br /> regarding sea level rise issue. Ms. Fenn responded that some <br /> p <br /> comments do relate to sea level rise, but it had not been A, <br /> mentioned by reference. '= <br /> gin►�� <br /> The Town Planner explained the committee Voted to raise the .f. <br /> first floor o f all structures approximately one foot <br /> level rise, pp � y, above sea ,E �� <br /> use, and to flood proof non-residential structures up to . '�" <br /> that level. He stated the issue that created the most r <br /> p ob l ems 1, . <br /> was the concept of movie the regulatory area inland <br /> Out someone' s <br /> g g y d and wiping „I , <br /> omeone s property by enlarging the flood zone, and the <br /> Wetlands migration issue. MS. Fenn clarified the wetlands j,�`'`` <br /> migration issue relates only to the ten-year flood zone, <br /> There was some discussion regarding the certification <br /> process. ) <br /> Ms. Fenn suggested the Board reconsider any of the issues <br /> a. <br /> raised by the commission. She acknowledged the local controversy <br /> .th re g sy <br /> a wl . <br /> Bard to this Element of the Plan, and noted the Board. may <br /> y <br /> not have a lot <br /> t of flexibility making changes. <br /> -$_ <br /> Si <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.