Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> al <br /> of outlines/requirements that the Review <br /> Committee can address. <br /> rather than citing specifics. The follow' ` <br /> owing specific page <br /> numbers and paragraphs were discussed.- <br /> Page 6-4, second paragraph }Specific landscaping <br /> standards. . . �� A Agreement hasstrikep g <br /> g been reached to the word , <br /> Specific" and amend to "General landsca in standards. . . �� <br /> - Reichel reported it is landscaping �' <br /> P the opinion of the ZBA <br /> to rely upon the � <br /> expertise of the Design Review Committee in these circumstanc <br /> es. <br /> Jon Kuchinski stated that most of the Massachusetts Bylaws <br /> he has read include some t <br /> e of Zan 4hf1' �u <br /> type landscape standard which are •;; <br /> used as guidelines. Ij <br /> it <br /> ilk' <br /> 11 ilr <br /> The chairman clarified that initially the ZBA was opposed to � <br /> any written standard. The Chairman Pp <br /> explained to the ZBA the <br /> Selectman were in favor of setting standards as it is fair i ;n <br /> n r:�.: ��lr <br /> terms of informing an applicant of what is required, and it is °IKI <br /> somethingthat i s defensible � � <br /> in court should the standard not be <br /> followed. h kk <br /> ra1e+ <br /> The Chairman reported that the ZBA is in favor of the <br /> words <br /> "General specif ications. . . if and asked if PlanningBoard '"" <br /> Members were in agreement, noting that a written standard would <br /> be developed in the future. John Kuchinski and Dennis Bal z 'arini <br /> stated they are in favor of the change. " <br /> Page 6-4, third paragraph, the last sentence. Mr. Reichel <br /> reported the ZBA suggestion that the words " . . .periodic update of <br /> sign n code" be u � � <br /> g used, to which there was no objection by the ra <br /> Planning Board. �A- 1 <br /> 1 <br /> 4 <br /> .-iy• <br /> Page 6-5, first paragraph, last sentence. This was <br /> rewritten to read, " . . . cons iderat ion should also be given to rye <br /> items such as 1 g �loading docks, trash disposal. . if The Chairman <br /> clarified the ZBA was not in favor of the develo ment of specific <br /> i �° <br /> p p c <br /> loading dock requirements. <br /> r�fs ra11 <br /> l <br /> Page 6-9, fourth paragraph. Mr. Reichel reported, the ZBA <br /> has requested the minimum be changed to read, _'15, 0 0 o" , The <br /> Chairman reported ZBA concerns were for septic density, fairness <br /> Y <br /> to the builder, and phasing issues. The Chairman reported he .� <br /> responded that his concern was to do what was right for the Town. <br /> It was agreed upon by all Planning Board Members that there would. <br /> b <br /> e no changes made in this regard. <br /> Page 6-9, last paragraph. The ZBA has requested this be <br /> stricken in its entirety. The Planning Board determined this to ' y� <br /> e a Cluster Subdivision, which is not a ZBA matter, and relates <br /> to a Special Permit of the Planning Board. <br /> Mr. Reichel page reported a e 6-10 to be more of the same <br /> p • <br /> dr <br />