My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/15/1998 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
04/15/1998 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2022 5:03:09 PM
Creation date
1/27/2022 1:44:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/15/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
neat deal that e <br /> ncumber a g at would otherwise have been built upon. <br /> . . <br /> Legal work would be required There would be a roadwaylocated <br /> outside of the limits of the defined wa cated ,f"= <br /> y, x, <br /> In order to eliminate the problem entirely, <br /> relocating the ■ �'. Rowley <br /> suggested g e side 1 line of the road so that the <br /> driving surface is located, entirely within the 1 imits of the <br /> layout (1f it doesn' t r ■ ■ � � <br /> educe the buildabil ity of the lot) . ' il Ik <br /> At the point the Chairman asked for clarification of the <br /> proposal before the Board to be twelve (12) additional lots for st:. <br /> building purposes; and five (5) lots remainingunder <br /> covenant, <br /> The Chairman asked. Attorney Kirrane Ki a bout the history of <br /> lengthening the cul-de-sac over the gears. <br /> a t <br /> Attorney Kirrane responded that at the time ■ , <br /> of the original <br /> approval of the plan, the access was proposed in order to avoid o d a <br /> dead-end road situation. He also stated his belief that the <br /> residents were not interested in a paved roadway, but that the 3, <br /> Planning Board has expressed safety concerns. He stated <br /> Applicant would be prepared to provide either th 'F <br /> p er a dirt or paved <br /> surface eventually, should the Planning Board deem it necessary. „ <br /> Should the Planning Board require pavement of the road at <br /> this time in order to release the lots Attorney Kirrane stated <br /> Applicant will do so; if the Planning Board chooses to J defer this <br /> requirement until such time as Applicant requests the release of <br /> the remainder f ` <br /> o the lots,s, i t would be done at that point. <br /> Ni <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated his opinion to be that Applicant has 1.It <br /> rights to Great Hay Road, whether it be determined to be a <br /> public <br /> or private road. He cited some conflicts in this regard, statin <br /> that there are r g g ��° <br /> po tions of Great Hay Road that have been <br /> abandoned by the Town, thereby definingthe road as a public way <br /> in the P , <br /> sense it has been in existence. He noted Great Ha Road <br /> an p as being there <br /> is shown on the 1877 1 y <br /> . <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated Applicant has attempted to <br /> accommodate the Town Planner' s concerns by restricting the <br /> building <br /> of the access to their side of the center line. <br /> Attorney Kirrane clarified Applicant owns to the nearest side <br /> line. <br /> fit•,,{.,,�•: <br /> Public Comment �f,F <br /> The following is a chronological list of s eakers having 4� ' <br /> been duly recognized by the chairman p g <br /> . <br /> Bob Crowley, 66 Snead Drive--Stated there are currently , <br /> enough tra f f i c problems without having through road to old <br /> Barns t g a g r' <br /> able, He expressed safety concerns regarding the younger <br /> children visiting grandparents. <br /> s. � <br /> g P <br /> -15- <br /> •i y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.