My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/15/1997 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
01/15/1997 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2022 2:44:59 PM
Creation date
1/28/2022 11:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/15/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
T' <br /> for construction u o p rp seS to be valid. (There a was brief r' <br /> discussion regarding alternatives, utilizing the main entrance � <br /> which the unit owners are opposed to. ) <br /> 3_ Attorney Butler stated he would explore the following <br /> through- <br /> and • a <br /> possibilities: Improvement to the roadway* hr j <br /> =�= y, t <br /> and the Com Electric easement. <br /> Mr. Eldredge suggested paving <br /> g gg p ng the road temporarily, removing <br /> t the pavement upon completion and restoring the road to its <br /> i orginal condition might be the best solution. <br /> � <br /> Charles Rowley suggested curving the road around the garage, <br /> decreasing the impact from Great Neck Road for safety purposes. <br /> Attorney Butler asked if there were any further issues to be M <br /> addressed for the next Nearing. lip <br /> Thomas Fudala made mention of the location of Building 15 . <br /> ''rl <br /> Charles Rowley asked for clarification of the aforementioned <br /> protective ringof units which are to be built ` <br /> t around the <br /> existing units. <br /> { <br /> Attorney Butler answered "5, 27, 26, 20, 17, Clubhouse and <br /> 19 " <br /> The Chairman inquired as to any public questions or comments <br /> in this matter and recognized Beverly Kane, who identified ,. <br /> herself for � <br /> the record as a representative of the Mashpee � <br /> Environmental Coalition. For the record, she stated that the <br /> Coalition is greatly concerned with this project because it is in ,r+ <br /> the very sensitive Mashpee River water shed. She stated the <br /> Coalition is interested in and would to ear like h �� more about the <br /> plans for the waste water treatment plant and would like to see a <br /> r nitrogen load of not greater than five (5) parts per million <br /> going into the water shed. She stated they would also like to be <br /> assured of proper monitoring procedures to be in effect after the <br /> 1 an �#p t i s built to insure proper performance. Also, the Planning <br /> Board imposed a condition in the original Aril 1957 Agreement, <br /> p g , <br /> that if ever there would be a Municipal waste water Treatment <br /> Commission, or some such similar body, operated by the Town of <br /> Mashpee that the owners of this project would agree in writing <br /> >> that the waste water treatment plant would be turned over to the <br /> - Town at the Town' s request. <br /> The Chairman asked Attorney Butler ,if he would address these v <br /> issues at the next Hearing. <br /> Attorney Butler agreed to do so. He did comment however, <br /> that there is a monitoring requirement already in the Special <br /> Permit <br /> ti <br /> a r <br /> �7- 1 <br /> i1Z �y <br /> �r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.