Laserfiche WebLink
-try I.i qR1, <br /> that the original plan unanimously approved by the Planning Board <br /> in 1987, is far superior in concept, layout and architectural <br /> , design than the proposed plan being presented at this Hearing. <br /> The unit owners also feel the original plan is a far better <br /> economic choice as owners and for the Town. <br /> Ms. Prose stated that the unit owners have unanimously <br /> agreed that the continued phasing rights to the development, <br /> along with the modifications to the original plan proposed by the <br /> developer are unacceptable. They have notified Mr. Bornstein <br /> j that they no longer have an interest in attempting to reach an <br /> agreement with his company regarding the future development of <br /> Windchime. She respectfully asked the Board to concur and <br /> thanked the Board for time and patience. <br /> The chairman recognized Art Traczyk, who stated the letter <br /> ' is not necessarily a commitment letter, their attorney is <br /> responding to it. The letter specifically says that Fannie Mae <br /> � has no objection to the extension of the phasing rights. Theis <br /> attorney feels that the Agreement must be signed between the <br /> current residents in order to grant the extension <br /> The Chairman asked if Attorney Butler has discussed this <br /> matter with Attorney Ford, to which Attorney Butler answered, <br /> No. " "I haven't. " This issue has not been raised at any of the <br /> f meetings attended by Attorney Ford, Mr. Traczyk and other members <br /> j of this group. <br /> Attorney Butler did say that he has spoken with senior <br /> counsel. for Fannie Mae in Washington, D.C. and has obtained an <br /> opinion from them that this comports with the language of the <br /> Master Deed and may be granted at any t ime, He stated that he <br /> { would be happy to have a dialogue with Attorney Ford on this <br /> issue; but that their position is f irm (and he feels correct) <br /> J {. <br /> that the unit owners have no rights whatsoever to interfere with <br /> future phasing of this condominium at the moment, <br /> �. E Attorney Butler addressed the issue of coverage impact on <br /> open space/green areas between the original approved plan and the <br /> - proposed. Attorney Butler made reference to a yellow-sheet <br /> handout entitled windchime Comparison.arison. There was <br /> p <br /> discussion regarding old-Proposed and Net Impact. He further <br /> referenced a letter from Terry Eldredge, breaking down the size <br /> of the units and square footage, garage size and square footage, <br /> and screened porches. The figures reflected in the handout <br /> a <br /> confirm that the total amount of impact on green space is <br /> ' relatively the same, 5, 000 square feet more,� of which thirty <br /> (30W) percent consists of the post office and meetinghouse. Mr. <br /> 4 Eldredge has prepared a parking analysis and has determined that <br /> based on this reconfiguration there is more parking, space- car <br /> wise for guests in the proposed facility than in the current <br /> facility. The total number Qf walkouts is thirty-four (34) . <br /> Attorney Butler pointed out for Board consideration the fact <br /> that they have tried to make the proposed plan as close to the <br /> pattern of roadways as in the original; to revegetate the <br /> roadways; to realign buildings. The proposed architectural <br /> design has been used throughout the Ignited States, has won <br /> awards, and is considered entirely appropriate. <br /> -10- <br /> f <br />