My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/05/1997 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
02/05/1997 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2022 1:47:34 PM
Creation date
1/28/2022 11:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/05/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Attorney Butler also arcade reference to a blue sheet handout <br /> .` entitled Modifications and Additions to Address Unit owner � <br /> Concerns numbered 1 through 18. Be made a point to be clear for �� <br /> the Record, that it wasn' t simply a matter of having had , <br /> discussions with the unit owners, showing them a plan a few weeks y„ <br /> ago with nothing happening in the intervening time period. There <br /> were at least three 3 meetings R► <br /> 4 � g held with Attorney Butler, <br /> Attorney Ford, Mr. Trac zyk. and an e 1 even page document dealing <br /> with issues requested by the unit owners to act upon something <br /> (changes, considerations) . The did not agree .�k g y gee to every one, but <br /> n. <br /> did in good faith try to compromise and address as man , <br /> .�: P y concerns <br /> `E as possible. The items listed in said handout are thins they �� <br /> would have no problem agreeing to as conditions of a. Special ' <br /> Permit Modification. Attorney Butler addressed the following,: <br /> The number of units are being reduced, Phasing schedule- lA is a <br /> {= ring around the existing units to be the first building phase, ` <br /> with an agreement to never have more than sixteen (16) units <br /> built at any one time in any phase unless they were under aR <br /> purchase and sale agreement or being sold and closed so there ' <br /> would be no vacant buildings.. T ; <br /> g They had hoped and compromised for <br /> the ability to have some flexibility to build throughout the <br /> balance of the project, forty-five (45) per year. There was an <br /> agreement to a temporary construction access for the of <br /> _ purpose f�, <br /> distancing vehicles from current unit owners. <br /> _- <br /> Agreement to <br /> upgrade roadway access to the septic <br /> � <br /> system. Agreement to � <br /> request of the Board a Covenant that building permits for <br /> subsequent phases or buildings within ongoing phases could be + <br /> withheld if there as r w n <br /> a y damage to any existing roadway within <br /> the condominium project that is not repaired on a timely basis. <br /> Agreement to provide appropriate gating so that there would be no <br /> access to areas under- construction. Agreement that Applicant <br /> would not be allowed, to lease a unit he owns to a third party. <br /> Agreement to submit to trustees all of the as-builts at any <br /> a <br /> particular building prior to the recording at the Registry of <br /> Deeds. Agreement to a minority position on the Board of <br /> E. Trustees. Agreement that the developer' s company would not be <br /> p y <br /> management. (Attorney Butler clarified the words Developer/Buyer <br /> to mean the same, Mr. Bornstein. ) Acknowledgment to pay the <br /> developer subsidy, as well as all other assessments and special <br /> r, p Y� p � <br /> conditions contained within the condominium documents. Agreement � <br /> to a post office building, a second pool, clubhouse and the ! , <br /> purchase of chairs and tables. Agreement to a Covenant that <br /> would prohibit the issuance of building permits with regard to <br /> construction cleanup. Agreement for an independent analysis <br /> X � I� g p` y, <br /> insuring the prof e c t would be constructed in accordance with , <br /> the plan, as well as retaining a supervising engineer, approved <br /> L and selected by the unit owners. There has been reconfiguration <br /> of the number of buildings in a certain area pointed out on theF <br /> plan in response to concerns regarding visual, noise and <br /> s aesthetic impacts on existing owners. Agreement for additional � <br /> landscaping. There is a plan that would enable the supervising <br /> engineer to limit clearing to five 5) feet around the perimeter �� <br /> g g <br /> .:r of the building, with additional clearing -taking place after the , <br /> r..., <br /> t., <br /> ;i <br /> v ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.