Laserfiche WebLink
hkY, y �1 <br /> .ram'"°�,,• '��� <br /> WOO <br /> Awl- Discussion-The Bornstein Company-TnTindchime Point <br /> rand recognized <br /> ion t o order g <br /> The Chairman called the Discussion <br /> 4! Mr. Bornstein who presented to the Board a complete set o <br /> detailed plans along with a letter from his Engineer, Peter F. <br /> de t a p i g <br /> no changes to the previously approved <br /> Dzmeo. certifying there are g <br /> • ': ,; plan on record. <br /> r <br /> ' <br /> John Kuchinski inquired as to a change of location o <br /> � ■ Mr. Bornstein stated that in the event <br /> Building #3 3/footprint. <br /> of any change, an appearance before the Board would be warranted. <br /> i questioned the difference of building shapes <br /> 3 John Kuchinski <br /> ' � between 4- lexes and suggested building configurations be shown <br />� bet p <br /> � in detail on the site plan, <br /> '' �'� Bornstein proceeded to explain how changes would be made <br /> �,4 Mr <br /> S. � :' <br /> utilizing square footage gained by not constructing fourteen 14 <br /> of the units approved on the original plan. <br /> '��� ' At this point there was Board/Applicant discussion regarding <br /> ■ <br /> � "I - fans buildin types. locations, and layouts, possible <br /> ., 4 e � necessary to p <br /> Ob modification of layout where deemed in o rotect <br /> in trees. <br /> Jill ,s certain <br /> Eric smith provided the original site layout approved plans <br /> for comparison. <br /> The Chairman determined the prof ect is to be developed in <br /> �!r <br /> * conformity with the plans approved on or about 19 8 S; and that the <br /> ■ y■ p tion of roads <br /> original site plan is to be used for the construe <br /> and driveways. <br /> ON i Mr. Borns t e in stated the site plan had been approved as it <br />.. ,;l��►,a,,�� '0,�� . � � Board t o gain <br /> n <br /> stands, and that he i s appearing before the g ■ ■ <br /> approval of the design remaining, the engineer has certified <br /> pp <br /> square feet per phase. <br /> � (There was discussion regarding proposed building <br /> 101 <br /> liltmaterials. ) <br /> ,� Z Board Members expressed their discomfort about the lack of a <br /> 111b,'R N <br /> .t« 5 detailed site plan indicating proposed footprints. <br /> , L_�j.�.:g : Mr. Bornstein requested approval of the plans as submitted <br /> Yx Pp'��* and proposed ro osed appearing before the Board prior to construction of <br /> building foundations. <br /> WO low John Kuchinski pointed out the fact that approval of the <br /> original plans was a very lengthy, involving many public <br />` hearings, public input and changes. He suggested all prior <br /> considerations be preserved as approved on the orig <br /> final site and <br /> ' architectural plans. <br /> 6 <br /> '+Its . <br /> 4t <br /> it`1 <br /> • 1 tip' •'�,,, <br /> �4 <br /> ,L • .St? <br />