My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/12/2003 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
03/12/2003 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2022 3:23:07 PM
Creation date
2/11/2022 3:19:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and Lot 17A/Parcel 5 on the Town Assessors Map ("the Property"). <br />• Defendants Anthony Shuman and Dorothy Kagan were the applicants for <br />the zoning relief for the Property challenged in this action. <br />GENERAL ALLEGATIONS <br />5. In or about Spring, 2003, defendants Anthony Shuman and <br />Dorothy Kagan, as the owner of the Property, were advised by the <br />Town of Mashpee Building Department that they would not be <br />permitted to divide the Property into two builable lots without <br />variances from the Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals. The Property <br />consists of two prior non -conforming lots that were deemed combined <br />due to common ownership after the 1987 amendment to the Bylaws <br />• <br />rendered them non -conforming, and the prior lots were now lacking <br />in adequate space, frontage and access to a paved road to be <br />buildable under the current Zoning Bylaw. <br />6. In or about Spring, 2003, defendants Anthony Shuman and <br />Dorothy Kagan filed an application/appeal to the defendant Mashpee <br />Zoning Board of Appeals, requesting the necessary variances from <br />the applicable provisions of the Mashpee Zoning Code so as to <br />permit them to divide the Property into tlo buildable non- <br />conforming lots. <br />7. On June 11, 2003, the defendant Board of Appeals conducted <br />a public hearing at which time it considered defendant Anthony <br />Shuman and Dorothy Kagan's application/appeal and request for <br />variances. <br />8. The plaintiff appeared at the public <br />with other neighbors, opposed the granting of <br />0 -3- <br />hearing and, along <br />the zoning relief <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.