Laserfiche WebLink
%°'�`�� Town offlashnee <br /> �sy J f" I <br /> N <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> 16 great J�eck load Xorth <br /> Mashpee,Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Decision for a Special Permit <br /> RE: Martin and Judith Wolff 5 Keel Way <br /> Map 120 Parcel 141 <br /> SP-02-134 <br /> Jt <br /> A Petition was filed on October 24, 2002 by Martin and Judith Wolff requesting a f <br /> Special Permit under Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws to allow for construction of <br /> an addition to an existing non-conforming structure on property located in an R-3 zoning <br /> district at 5 Keel Way (Map 120 Parcel 141) Mashpee, MA. <br /> ;I <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a <br /> newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, November 1 and November 8, <br /> 2002, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> I <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at which time the following members of the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Robert Nelson, Zella Elizenberry I' <br /> and Frederick Borgeson. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the Ii <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 40A, Section 9 and the Town of <br /> 1 <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Mr. John Slavinsky of Cape & Islands Engineering represents the petitioner. He i E <br /> f 9 A <br /> is requesting a Special Permit to construct 2 new entryways and additional square footage <br /> to the home. Mr. Nelson reads two letters of objection from Jim Vaccaro, Chairman of <br /> 7 <br /> New Seabury ARC and Gerald Gaffin of Framingham, MA. for the record. There is a <br /> The proposed second floor cantilevered deck will be 15 feet and a Special Permit to <br /> construct the work. The front setbacks require 30 feet and they are at 27 feet. Lot <br /> f <br /> coverage is 30% in a cluster area and they are at 20.1%. that is inside the deck. This <br /> would make the pre-existing condition even farther away from the wetlands. <br /> Conservation has signed off on this matter. Mr. Nelson feels this is not substantially <br /> t I: <br /> I' <br /> tl <br />