|
an i i i deve loperf6r,the ffieflity. Mr. Koohari h q uired, whether the development for each,project was
<br /> tobe Stir: separately foor a) 1 11 1 ,I r,-would,, the Planning B,oai-d beable to appl-ovethe
<br /> .[, prova 1,
<br /> master plan. Mr. Storrs stated,that it could be cornpleted elter way and the Chair stated her,
<br /> preferetice that it,be completed all together. Mr. Storrs stated th,at the'uses were not yet known"
<br /> There was dis,cussi,on,ab,out internal, dnveways, at,Mashpee U,omi.,i,,,ioi.i,,s ,v,e,rs"us streets and
<br /> necessar,ysetbacks. poectwoudallow the
<br /> Planning Board.to make accommodations for the, development while the Town's, needs couldbe
<br /> addressed with initi,gation such,as pat,-.ksor'l-ig,"h,,ti",j,l,,g,'bu,t pres enting the project pi.ecemcal. would,
<br /> not allow the Town'to negotiate with Mashpee Conin:ions. Mr. Storrs stated, 'that'the master plan
<br /> had been in place for 10 years. There was discussion regard.,i'ng Mashpee Commons- withdrawal
<br /> from the 3-�Party Cliajiri,iian, Way-gan expressed co about granting"
<br /> relief on a parcel-by-parcel basis and suggested,fliatshe woulld be unable to gpti,t rebefs w*thout
<br /> ktiow''I ng what deve I lopment wouldbe occu r'ning,aroundt'he project. Mr., Storrs stated that lie
<br /> wouldbe comfortable etidorsing the Steeple Street Master PI'ail,but noted-that he, could n, be
<br /> su A re about uses. The Chair stated th.at the Planning Board was working wItli, the comm,,"unity
<br /> 0
<br /> on.the deve-lopment of a ommon to
<br /> green,� arks system, lneludiiig I'li-nks withm Mass[i ce Cs
<br /> ,P �p
<br /> existing trails and, open space., and suggested. that itwould,be good to,discti,.ss a,green",parks
<br /> system alon,g witla the Master Plan andinclude a legally binding,agreement. 'The Chair
<br /> ei 'bil' 1 'or tlie,-.1iphasized that when of"fering refid,", the Planning Board had a r�esponsi, ity to do it f
<br /> public good. ReJ76arcnclll,I,g the dra,ft minutes from tlie Design and, Site PlaIlReview Committeeit
<br /> was noted that thzre were reuse that-would need to, be reLsol,ved.
<br /> 11 1. 1 from tli.e Planning, rd Mr. Ford stated that Na ional D eve],opin,en,t was seeking,u'rect'un B oa to
<br /> t
<br /> "der the project as,a,commercial on its ow,n. Mr. Fordstated,that Nafional,
<br /> consi I
<br /> Develop-i-nent would have standing to apply for a Pei,--rnit a-,tld suggested the possibility that
<br /> Masbpee could,be a party to the pennunting process. M,—, ., Kooharian stated that he
<br /> supported the project and not that other issues needed tobe addressedwith Mashpee
<br /> Coirnlnons. Mr. Fudala questioned whether the Planning Board felt that,the project,met t,lie
<br /> threshold R)r the Co'nii'Derci,al C I enter Bylaw. Mr. Ford responded,thatit was defined,a-,s a.group
<br /> Of si,111,11ar,establishments and, suggested,that the development would,include three households,
<br /> anA fit the det-inItIO1.11, as, well as part of the Steeple Street,development plan., Phanning Board
<br /> members pointed,outthot the,project couid not stalid on its own and,,be part, of the Mas"Ilitree
<br /> ComIllons,p I Ian. Mr,. Fudala stated,tat the,presence of a rtiedleal,ofl'ice could,be considered a
<br /> second use. The Chair stated,that she wouldbe more comfoi-tabte: cotisidering the project as part
<br /> of thernaster plan. Mr. Ford responded tb,at the Plann.ing Board had a responsibility to consider
<br /> the Commercial Center Byla'w as, a wholle, rather,than, ind'v*dual conapoi.-iwnts. 'flae Chair stated
<br /> that the facilit wouldbe a single use and.not a,commercial center In the spirit of the bylaw.
<br /> Y
<br /> MnPel!ens,en,inq,uired, about the heigbt of the structure aiid possible ileca,to increase'the patkng
<br /> shou I Id the facility expand,,. Mr. Tye stated that there,would, be no 'expansi I on andlthat, 'whileill
<br /> the plannung sta,ges,th.ey would deterrnIne whether the structure wouldbe 1, story or, I I/z stortes,
<br /> Mr. Tye noted,that approximatc.1y 30 employces would,work at the fdcllity over a 7-day
<br /> 111-nefranie. Mr. Tye stated,that the 'facilities,were typi.cally welcomed into communities '.f'or their
<br /> services, and as taxpayers, and asked that the Boardfimd a way to work with Natlional
<br /> Development or noti-fy,them If it would.not work,ducto the expe-use invol-ved with planning.
<br /> 'ig,re. befter the coniniu-nIty, sucb, as
<br /> The Chai"r expreLSI.Sedlier interest in,the'Town receivn t,,-Iief t(
<br /> 4
<br />
|