|
the GreenParks, and MrBalzarnexpre,sLsedcon,cLr
<br /> ect'sbing' ented
<br /> p
<br /> Piecemeal but stated that he would li.keto see the,project move forward. Mr. Tye indi caul ed that
<br /> ll,e would,notbe able to solve the issues wit,hM[I,CIshpee Commons but noted that tie mcilitry
<br /> wouId m1fil"gate its impact on the coninaunity by contrib,ut,Lng to, open space, ad',,,cling that. Itwould
<br /> create tax dollars and benefits to eomrnUnit . It was ell,i y ii,rit citional Developmentwas
<br /> ied that N, 1,
<br /> not,ca .50,1,C3 and,WOUId be paying taaes. Mr. Storrs noted,that,when,the zon"', ordinance g a
<br /> a
<br /> drafted,,the InC111,101-Y C- re facilitly was an unantic1pated use. Mr. Storrs also stated that-no one,
<br /> would want"to create excess parking,,
<br /> y*
<br /> Mr. Petersen alsotagreed.t hat t.],le pr o ject was a good tie but expressed concei, that should rel'iet
<br /> beofIered 'Un advance,plans could change,or could set a precedent, such as with setbacks. Mr.
<br /> F t1le p
<br /> Ford.responded that revie wing, ect as a.Co i Center on 'Its own would not set a
<br /> roj merc.,tal
<br /> precedent as thewaivers, woutd �,rtpply offly to, the m,,,em,o,r,Y carefaellity., There was, additional
<br /> concern, expressed regardlti,g the ice dlro,r ai,'naster phan and the offering o� re 'e,
<br /> f li. f. Mr. Tye
<br /> -est egarding developmentadjacent,to the
<br /> enilibas,ized, an, investot,, lie also had,, an intet r
<br /> hei,,r
<br /> Eacility and,M expressed, corn,f,ort.In Masbpee Con1m,01.1's prehini,nary niaster'p'taln, as we'll a,s t'
<br /> dessign restricti,ons. Mr. Tye all'Sostated that Jthougli Mashpee,: Co mons wouldbe un,sure of
<br /> M
<br /> their prQI,eCt S uses, th ey w o,u 1 d, sti 11, have to see a,pproval firom th e P lann irig B o -LILI,
<br /> ard. Mr. M i''n
<br /> felt that it was not p- rop a care fficHity,prQject contingent, upon tlie
<br /> priate to make,'the memorY,
<br /> Mashpee Cornmons projivet.
<br /> ab h d whether It -would,,be a cttrb or Wit
<br /> Mr. Peterse '
<br /> n inquired out �t' c other side of the road, an
<br /> 11, -was a good, po" t and, wowd be a, design
<br /> would ,feature hatid-scaping. Mr., Storrs re'sponded, that *t, in
<br /> issue. Mr. Rowley notedthat the project", as a single parcel, would feature 12-14 parallel parking
<br /> spaces and wouldbe accessible to anyone-unless ot' Wise*
<br /> h � i se ni,arked as reserved fiv the. fiaci lity.
<br /> Mr. Rowley also poinu�,,d out tIi,,,a,t p4ark:hn,,,g'niay be challenging for dt-op-ofrfis to'the b uilding, and
<br /> l
<br /> the inconvenienice of ile-ellter"JingGreat Neck, Road, South, Mr. ',Rowley stote d thataddi al tloi
<br /> in,_tori,nation wouddbe needed to assess ston i,,iwater ills,.sues,, Mr. "I"Ye responded that the
<br /> approp,z1l Cate nuani,ber of par I in spaces wouldbe provided to satisfy the,Board prefeTenice,
<br /> adding that there would. also be,parking spaces availaa,ble at tile f nt ofthe build,ing,, Mr., rye
<br /> also stated tb,at ambul ances, wotild park at a,door rather tlian in a,parking space and that no
<br /> special, carnbttlance ent17ance would be availl abIc ,qsiii,ce It wo,,is a t-eside-ritial, firicil,"Ity. Mr,. For
<br /> sl ge,sted that based on concern,s regard n
<br /> 1, gthe],and aeroLsLs froin, theroad, Mashpte Comin.lons,
<br /> cou,ld 'becomc part of t1w Sp(,1:cI a], Peri-nit Process so that colidifio,In,S", could be placed,ort thebu ffer
<br /> 10'�11 Je
<br /> and be eniburceable. Mr. Petersen inqLlired,about label ti,g fior-the parking locatednear th
<br /> YC le tcap and/or,5 min'tite,parking
<br /> entratice and,"Mr., T .1 �sponded that signage wou,ld include h'andi
<br /> only. Mr. Pete17sen itlquixe d, whether National Developnient.1,1ad,other propertles, wli,ereby
<br /> p arking was located oil,someone elses property and Mr. T-Ye responded,that it,was a,unique
<br /> siltu,ation.. Mr. Petersen recornt'n ended tbalt Corn mons,allow the street parking closest to
<br /> the entrance be hoindicap rather t'll,an,, general park.,"Ing aild Mr, S.", torrs responded, that,it could be'
<br /> done if itiiiade sense. It was noted that the parking spaces could be labeled reservedbut-not
<br /> handicap, since,tliey were parallel spots. Eniployee ark-ing wouId be located behind,the p
<br /> he tacil
<br /> building. Mr, "I"ye indicated that,much, of tli,,c detail oft 'lity would,be diSICUSSed, ful"l-ther at
<br /> another tirne.
<br /> 5'
<br />
|