Laserfiche WebLink
•y a <br /> Mashpee Zoning Wags Road Realty Trust SP-00-215 2 <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> Mr. Hatem,proposed developer and owner of two gasoline service stations in <br /> Falmouth, attended the meeting along with Messrs. Peter and Bruce Garrett of Volta Oil <br /> and Ms. Paula Kelley from Attorney Ament's office. <br /> The Zoning Board of Appeals granted a Variance on the subject property <br /> allowing for construction of the gasoline/service station. <br /> Mr. Govoni read a letter from the Falmouth Zoning Board of Appeals that stated: <br /> "During the past five or six years Hatem Enterprise has appeared before the Falmouth <br /> Zoning Board of Appeals on a variety of projects" and that Mr. Hatem is"very <br /> cooperative and develops the properties as represented. When an issue has arisen, Mr. <br /> Hatem has been very prompt to address the situation". <br /> Mr. David Hendrick, an abutter, said that the proposal would be a"great <br /> improvement"to the subject property. <br /> No other comments were received from abutters. <br /> SPECIAL PERMIT CRITERIA <br /> Section 174-17 of the Mashpee Zoning By-laws and Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A, Chapter 6,require a finding that the extension, alteration or change <br /> shall not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing <br /> non-conforming use. <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> 1. that the subject property is located at 723 Falmouth Road and consists of <br /> 40,901 square feet of land. <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> 1. there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking. <br /> 2. while the proposed construction will increase the non-conforming nature of <br /> the structure,the proposal would provide a much-needed gasoline service and <br /> repair station within the Town;therefore,the changes will not result in a <br /> structure or use which is more detrimental to the neighborhood than the prior <br /> non-conforming structure and its use. <br /> 3. removal of the existing, dilapidated structure would be an improvement to the r' <br /> subject property and to the neighborhood. <br /> r. <br /> f�X <br />