Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning William& Priscilla Coughlin V-01-82 2 <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> Ii I I i <br /> the existing cesspool with installation of a new septic system. The proposal conforms to <br /> the 30-foot height restriction of the Popponesset Overlay District. <br /> Mr. Govoni read several letters from neighbors in approval of the proposal and <br /> one letter from an abutter, Mr. Dermot O'Donnell, in opposition to the proposal. Mr. <br /> O'Donnell expressed concern with the huge increase in the size of the footprint. Mr. <br /> Edward Mahoney, President of the Popponesset Beach Association, attended the meeting <br /> and voiced his support of the project. III Iii <br /> Mr. Thomas J. O'Neill, architect for the project, stated that the proposed j <br /> construction would be further away from the pond and that extensive landscaping of the Ill <br /> subject property is also planned. <br /> The Board voiced its concern over the proposed large increase in the lot coverage. <br /> �f <br /> The Board voted unanimously to take the Petition under advisement until October 24, <br /> 2001. <br /> II <br /> At the continued hearings on October 24 2001 Mr. David Sanicki engineer from <br /> g � � g I ' <br /> Cape & Islands Engineering, and Mr. Thomas J. O'Neill, architect, represented the <br /> Petition. Mr. Sanicki stated that he made in error in calculating the proposed lot coverage. <br /> III , <br /> II I <br /> The lot coverage would be 21.8%, not 23.9%. The Board made several suggestions on <br /> how the proposed lot coverage could be reduced. <br /> Mr. Govoni read letters from Mr. David Foley and Ms. Maryclare Himmel in <br /> I <br /> opposition to grant of Variance relief from the lot coverage requirements. <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine j <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and I� <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would ( I <br /> involve hardship to the petitioner. <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> 1. that the subject property is located at 35 Uncatena Road and consists of j <br /> 10,5 80 square feet of land. <br /> i � I <br />