My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/06/1996 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
11/06/1996 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2022 5:01:21 PM
Creation date
3/8/2022 2:04:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/06/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
noting the crowding of the site and building size. He further <br /> stated progress has been made in terms of communication between <br /> Applicant and current owners . The greatest progress has been <br /> made in the design issues raised by unit owners including size <br /> ` x ,h reduction of units, reconfiguration of the location of buildings, <br /> yLr� the addition of two new one-way roadways and sidewalks in certain <br /> / P, d;`' locations, an additional pool, and a pavilion. The number of <br /> units has been reduced to one hundred forty-two (142) new units <br /> for a total of one hundred fifty-six (156) , the original permit <br /> was for one hundred seventy (170) , being a fourteen (14) unit <br /> reduction. There have also been additional changes addressing <br /> the concerns regarding garages and dumpsters. <br /> Attorney Butler further stated they have not progressed to <br /> the next stage of developing more specific architectural plans <br /> and floor plans. He has not directly addressed some of the legal <br /> r issues with Attorney Ford, who represented the unit owners at the <br /> �� beginning of this Hearing. He stated that he has done some <br /> research and has had communications with different entities <br /> 1 ' unrelated to the unit owners and feels confident that the <br /> 1w1 conceptual design localized site plan type issues that were of <br /> ►; ' r concern to the unit owners can be adequately addressed; the legal <br /> �► � issues will fall into place. <br /> Attorney Butler reported that although progress is being <br /> made, he was not prepared to present more specific information <br /> other than to answer questions. <br />{ <br /> Attorney Butler made a request to come back before the Board <br /> in order to readdress some of the specific legal and site plan <br /> modification issues. He also stated that he has had <br /> communications with the Trustees of Reservations who now are in <br /> possession of updated plans. Charlie Wyman has requested in <br /> writing, a reconsideration of the division of, responsibilities <br /> between the Town and Trustees (deeding land/dealing more directly <br /> with the Town) to which they are not opposed. <br /> IIII Ili Attorney Butler suggested Mr. Traczyk update the Board from <br /> the unit owners' perspective- -The Chairman recognized Art <br /> Traczyk for this purpose. <br /> " ,'4 Mr. Traczyk confirmed that the unit owners have met with Mr. <br /> ,I Bornstein and his engineer several times. He stated there remain <br />, rr'��� .k; <br /> some great concerns regarding buildings and their locations (20, <br /> 19 and additional buffering) . Mr. Traczyk was making reference <br />�' •�- ,�� to Attorney Butler' s plan at this point. He mentioned their <br /> �►,' concern for the preservation of trees within the open space in <br /> order to buffer, as much as possible, along the power line. They <br /> did agree upon the two one-way streets; and from the five (5) <br /> ,k crescents originally proposed, there are three (3) remaining. <br /> 4,, <br /> WIN �, p4trjak Coffey asked how close the newly proposed plan is <br /> ` t-o the Qrzg�nal plan. <br /> �i <br /> NV <br /> L. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.