My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/18/1996 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
12/18/1996 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2023 2:04:28 PM
Creation date
3/8/2022 3:21:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/18/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> r <br /> E <br /> i <br /> The Chairman suggested meeting with a gg g printer in order to <br /> determine how well the maps and charts will reproduce. Tom <br /> Fudala stated a final summary version will be presented to Town <br /> Meeting. Also, separate maps should be developed for people who <br /> are not accustomed to reading the parcel map. <br /> Bennett Gordon suggested introducing three area maps, to !~ : <br /> coincide with a the suggested area division, if adopted. <br /> Jim Hanks: Asked if another committee in needed in Mashpee. <br /> Perhaps the National Resource Committee could encompass public <br /> P � <br /> access. Town Counsel should be consulted. The Coastal Resources <br /> Working Group is an ad hoc committee lending support to the Plan. <br /> Near-term events should be eliminated, targeting a future date <br /> in 1997. Regarding public access, unfair for taxpayers to pay <br /> the full expense, users should help defray costs. Land <br /> acquisitions mentioned in the 4-year plan seem inappropriate. <br /> Tom Fudala responded this could be taken out of the Coastal .. <br /> Resources Plan, as this is mentioned in the Open Space section. <br /> Jim Hanks: No mention of action for Popponesset Spit. The - <br /> issue of erosion should be addressed. <br /> The Chairman inquired as how to best address issues on pages <br /> 3-41. There seem to be some issues that need to be resolved <br /> between the Waterways Commission and the Comprehensive Plan as <br /> presented. , <br /> Jim Hanks suggested Eric Smith go through the Plan, listing <br /> all points of contention for discussion between them at another <br /> meeting. <br /> Board Members were in agreement, noting anything that is not <br /> resolved is to come back before the Board. <br /> 4 <br /> The Chairman addressed the issue of accuracy of Shellfish <br /> Maps. <br /> Jim Hanks: The maps used in the Plan date back to 1990, <br /> they should be updated. The shellfish situation changes <br /> dynamically. <br /> The Chairman recognized Richard York, Shellfish Constable, ! <br /> who stated the Shellfish Commission believes the maps should be <br /> kept in the Plan, and defined as shellfish resource areas. They <br /> include habitat and historical populations. The maps are very i <br /> useful, they have been updated, and will continue to be <br /> completely updated. They are useful for mooring fields, docks, <br /> etc. <br /> Tom Fudala agreed the maps should be continually updated and <br /> the Plan is to be updated every five years. <br /> -7- <br /> 11 <br /> I <br /> J� <br /> ti. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.