Laserfiche WebLink
quality, research, fisheries, public access, barrier beaches, <br /> safety and emergency response plans. <br /> Five-Year Action Plan: Year 1-Coastal Research and Managing <br /> Plan update addressing C. 91 issues, ACEC, maintenance dredging <br /> +` and development of Mashpee Dredging Plan and storm water <br /> improvements, Coastal Pollution Mediation grants. <br /> I,'/�{!'' Year 2-Discussion regarding the pursuit of any State <br /> improvements, apply for the National Flood Insurance Program. <br /> Departmental Site Plan Review Committee, including Conservation <br /> 4r „ Agent, Harbor Master and Shellfish Constable. <br /> Year 3-Zoning update and By-law development necessary for <br /> the implementation of Plans. Mashpee River dredging-1999. <br /> +� Year 4-Initiate permitting process for Ockway Bay and <br /> Popponesset Bay. Waquoit Bay water shed storm water. <br /> Year 5-Maintenance dredging (5-year State permit; 10-year <br /> el "► � Federal permit) . <br />, , Other Action: Prioritize storm water improvement; move <br /> mapping programs. <br /> Long Term Actions: Monitor water quality, base line <br /> All studies, public access, emergency planning, and coordination. <br /> The draft Coastal Resources portion of the Meeting concluded <br /> at 8:10 p.m. The Chairman recognized the Waterways Commission <br /> for the purpose of addressing points of their review and analysis <br /> of the Plan. <br /> Jim Hanks: Suggested categorizing the document into three <br /> sections-Waquoit Bay and tributaries, Popponesset Bay and <br /> tributaries, and Ocean Front. <br /> Eric Smith commented that perhaps the Plan could be <br /> separated as Mr. Hanks suggested. Tom Fudala agreed that certain <br /> items could be separated. <br /> Bennett Gordon: Suggested not changing the Table of <br /> !' Contents. Example: Water and non-water Dependent Uses of Public <br /> Access, General Discussion, Popponesset Bay information, Waquoit <br /> Bay and Ocean Front. <br />' 1 The Chairman agreed that this component is an important <br /> 1 aspect of the Plan and will most likely be referred to <br /> frequently, justifying the work involved to make changes. <br /> �I c;, Jim Hanks: Suggested down sizing the document, some of the <br /> data is outdated, recommended a bibliography be provided and <br /> stated the maps are a "definite problem. " Mr. Hanks and Eric <br />• � �''(' have meet to discuss these comments. <br /> Eric Smith stated they were "very good comments, " Tom <br /> Fudala stated it was likelysome of the suggestions would be <br /> gg <br /> adopted and some not. Eric stated there were conflicting <br /> opinions regarding the Shellfish Maps. <br /> a <br />