Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck RoadArorth <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />Joseph Gallant- He is abutting the largest lot on the cul-de-sac. He worked with this developer when he <br />was taking lots out of flood zones and making them sellable. With the aquafer, the more water taken <br />out, the more salt coming in. Echo Road finally has asphalt, but he would like to see more retention. <br />Evergreen Circle has retention. In the wintertime all the salt from the roads is going into the retention <br />area. All the hydraulic oil from commercial and industrial, and back part of his property is industrial. <br />Fifteen years ago the Flagship Storage built, there was a water deficit of 900,000 gallons a day in <br />Mashpee. There were one or two wells that mitigated 300,000 gallons leaving a 600,000 gallon water <br />deficit a day. They worried if Flagship caught on fire the sprinkler system would suck the water leaving <br />Mashpee dry. They tried to force him to put in a well and the town wanted to hook up to that well. Water <br />is his issue. He drinks the Mashpee water because he took Poland Spring water and did the $300 test, <br />and Mashpee's water is cleaner than Poland springs, no fluoride. His primary concern is his water and <br />the size of that lot. As a society we haven't come to a point when we are keeping our roads clean and <br />free of debris that ends up in our water ways, where there are catch basins. Kieran has designed many <br />lots that fail due to the paver and the perviousness of the road. Nobody is going to buy property with <br />stone parking on it. He would like to see that lot have some severe restrictions for what can and can't <br />be done. The end of that lot where it hits Ashumet Road, can he get a written guarantee that there will <br />never be an access point. He was told that property could never be sold when he bought his. When are <br />we going to stop paving over the land and let the water get where it needs to be? <br />Mr. Lehrer commented in regards to the large property at the end, any use such as a lumber yard <br />would require a special permit. With regard to access from Ashumet, there is not substantial enough <br />frontage to gain access. Under town zoning it would not be permissible but there are permitting <br />pathways. <br />Sam Geoffrion- She has a couple questions regarding setbacks. Are the setback requirements for this <br />lot 75 ft. frontage, 20 ft. in the rear, and 75 ft. on the sides? Does setback mean buildings then you can <br />have 75 ft. of paving in the front? Is it an undisturbed set back and is there a total percentage of lot <br />coverage allowed? She is curious about fitting a building and parking with those setbacks. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated it is dependent on the zoning district in which they lie. This particular lot is bisected by <br />3. The front closest to Main St. is C-3 limited commercial. They are required to maintain 40% of the site <br />undisturbed and natural, 75 ft. setbacks both front and side. As you get into industrial site requirements <br />are less restrictive but setbacks don't change. Parking in the zoning bylaw discourages from the front <br />but encourages side and rear. For these lots the ZBA would have authority, a specific finding that a <br />unique situation necessitated parking in front, but generally front is reserved for natural area, <br />landscaping, and retention of storm water. C-3 has more requirements, at least 25% of the lot can be <br />covered with structures. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if you can put a condition on a subdivision plan. She would like a condition that <br />there will be no access onto Ashumet Road. Would Lot 1 come to the Planning Board or ZBA? Why <br />would it go to one verses the other? <br />