My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/06/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
04/06/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:54:31 PM
Creation date
5/3/2022 10:11:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/06/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road.North <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />Mr. Lehrer stated the condition is better accomplished through the Special Permit process. Lot one <br />would go to the ZBA. Whether it appears before the PB or ZBA depends on use and size of the facility. <br />A 10,000 s.f. building or more would necessitate a DRI, commercial centers, or a wireless facility would <br />all appear before the Planning Board. <br />Mr. Pesce stated a driveway curb cut would go to the DPW. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if you can put a special permit on a definitive subdivision. <br />Mr. Pesce stated you would have to have some kind of basis for that. <br />Mr. Kirrane commented he is only talking about the front, they are subdividing and putting a road in, not <br />dealing with the back lot. He would be reluctant to prejudice his client. <br />Mr. Lehrer commented there's a section of zoning bylaw that deals with lots in split zones. This lot is <br />bisected in the south westerly and the part of the frontage on Ashument Road with 20 ft. access. He is <br />assuming there is a conforming lot, is it 80,000 s.f.? Do you have a conforming lot there? <br />Ms. Waygan said its zoned R-5. <br />Mr. Lehrer is that one lot is bisected if the area south of that boundary is confirming, it's governed by <br />residential zoning district requirements. You couldn't get a building permit for that because it does not <br />have adequate frontage on a street. If its 80,000 s.f. it would be governed by residential requirements <br />not industrial. <br />Ms. Waygan would like to withdraw her request for a condition. <br />Mr. Lehrer would like to get s.f. of that lot finalized as it would be beneficial. <br />Mr. Balzarini is concerned about entering on to Rt. 130. He would like to see an attempt to negotiate <br />with the developer and try to use their road to get to their property. Mr. Balzarini noted that he offered, <br />but he doesn't know what he was offering. <br />Mr. Kirrane is open to continuing a discussion with Mr. Maffei and he would like to see this subdivision <br />have a vote before the Board this evening. If they are able to reach an agreement to use Nicoletta's <br />Way, they can come back with a revised plan, potentially less costly to enter into an agreement than <br />build the road. <br />Ms. Waygan commented if that if this is approved tonight they will never come back. <br />Mr. Phelan stated there was just a major crash at Echo Road. This is a very congested area to have a <br />road in between those busy roads. He has strong reservations. That roadway is very straight which <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.