Laserfiche WebLink
They will present the Board with a proposed schedule. <br /> Mr. Kirrane asked if it is the Board's opinion that they <br /> have two years from start of discharge permit to <br /> substantially develop project'? A complete understanding of <br /> this issue is needed. <br /> That is the opinion of the Board but would like a letter <br /> from Mr. Kirrane explaining his position. <br /> They will return on April 4th at 7:00. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Applicant: New Seabury Corp. <br /> Location: Bufflehead Bay' Great Neck Road South <br /> Request: Extension and project review. <br /> Mr. Chris Burden and Mr. mike Grotsky were present, <br /> They presented an update of events which have occurred in the <br /> past year and a request for an extension of the deadline for <br /> submitting a definitive . <br /> They explained that several issues need to be resolved <br /> including land ownership, environmental recourse area, exact <br /> design of the project, land swap agreement. <br /> Mr. Grotsky stated that the Cape Cod Commission Act will <br /> have the most serious impact on the project. In order to do <br /> a proper plan, they could not come up with something of <br /> quality by that deadline. <br /> They were hoping they could continue discussions with the <br /> Planning Board. They do not want to rush and have a <br /> comprise plan to meet that deadline. <br /> Tom stated that as of the 28th, if the Act passes, they will <br /> have to transmit this whole project to the Commission and <br /> stop this process . Tom suggested that they jointly request <br /> of the Commission a continuation so they can work with the <br /> Planning Board until something has been worked out to send <br /> to them.. <br /> Chris Burden will rely on Tom' s advise on how this should be <br /> handled. <br /> Tom will draft a letter and the Board and New Seabury will <br /> review it and sign it. <br /> . Mike Grotsky stated that they are - requesting an extension <br /> for an additional year and included a revised schedule of <br /> activities for the project. <br /> The Timetable goes to February, but they are assuming that <br /> some issues will not be resolved in time. <br /> Tony stated they should include something of substance to <br /> base request on. This report clearly defines the issues -, <br /> He thinks it should accompany the letter as a summary. It <br /> is the best way to get the support and cooperation of the <br /> Commission. <br /> 4 <br />