Laserfiche WebLink
They f eel they are at a dlsadvan.rage to undo s Land what s s o JL161-a <br /> on. <br /> Wayne responded that all Planning Board meetings are ope�1. ';--o the <br /> public. Traditionally, discussion regarding wart,an t ar tio?es <br /> happen at the meeting before Town meeting date. The ag: nda is open <br /> to the public . The Board would loge to see more puhlyc at those <br /> meet n g s . <br /> Louise explain ed that a public hearing cannot be scheduled until <br /> the articles have been approved for the warrant and then they have <br /> to give public notice. <br /> Tony suggested indefinitely postponing this article at this po-in t <br /> since there is no action by the rotary bypass comrn .t tee . <br /> Wayne stated that the Board has spent a lct of time working on -t-his <br /> and are moving in the gong direction. They discussed it for <br /> months and now within 10 minutes will indefinitely pos tpon: it . <br /> Just because others have stopped working on it doesn' t mean the <br /> Board should stop. <br /> Louise ,,ade a motion to recommend appr oval of article 2: Way ne <br /> seconded the motion. Bat abstained. All other board mer bers w:E--re <br /> in favor. (4-0---1) <br /> Marie Scallie stated that the public is wasting their time if. the <br /> Board is not willing to consider their input. <br /> Tony stated in his -opinion the public input which was given was not <br /> relevant to this article, it was regarding another matter . <br /> Marie responded that she believes the bicycle path to be unsaf :. <br /> Tony explained there has been no permit granted yet for any bicycle <br /> path, if they cannot get the people to the tahle the permittyr�g <br /> process will never start. <br /> Tom stated that this has broader applice.baLlity which cor�cer;%s hi�i. <br /> A member of the public asked where did they come up with the 15 <br /> feet? <br /> Fat stated that it was the rotary by pass comry .t tee R the -"orr.n <br /> Planner, Fields Point , the cathol-ic church working together fcr a <br /> by pass design/concept that would work for everyone. <br /> The concept , design and the work which went into- it he is all fcr .. <br /> AF�.TicLE . 3 : Tony read the article . The Grou.ldwate Protecti::n <br /> District by law does not take into account cluster suhdiv_.son and <br /> open space incentive developments . This article would remove Lha_ <br /> inequity and allow OS ID and cluster subdJ.v�.sicn to be re�ul aced <br /> based on overall pro l ect impervious surf ace coverage. <br /> It also removes a grammatical f eature. which provides no restrictior. <br /> on coverage by indus trial development. <br /> A Member of the public asked if there was any study done to asses <br /> the irmpac t of the change . <br /> Tom explained that they could not do a study because it is ba sec? on <br /> someone rlhoic w . They would have to know if the developer wa c;:,i+gig <br /> -- 7 - <br />