My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/19/1990 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
09/19/1990 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2022 5:02:24 PM
Creation date
6/22/2022 3:46:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/19/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
to do a cluster or a grid subd rvi ion. `A'h�y are a t temp tom;. to <br /> remove the inequi tv of the grid vs . the cl us ter Thev w -L':it to <br /> encourage cluster subdivisions . <br /> The public asked where they came up with the 15%. it is ve <br /> ambiguous , why not use a formula. <br /> Tony stated that it is based on a reco�emended standard fro : the <br /> State , historically the town of Mashpee used a percentage. <br /> Louise stated that clusters have much less roads , much '-Less <br /> coverage therefore it will be a net gain. <br /> Mr. Mollov stated he sees a. problem. with groundwater f loWs , the <br /> concentration of coverage may of feet the groundwater. <br /> Louise state-Ad that groundwater flow reports are required. <br /> Toni explained the water quality monitoring program which is <br /> required. The Town has been very strict. <br /> A member of the public asked if wetlands count towards open space? <br /> Tom stated that they do not count towards open space. <br /> Louise Trade a motion to recommend article 3 . Pat seconded the <br /> motion. All Board members were in favor . 5--0 . <br /> ARTirLE 4 : Tony read the article . '?`hys article defines a <br /> commercial center� and establishes a rev�.ew procedure and mini.�a.l <br /> standards for commercial centers . The art+cle also clar�.fJ es the <br /> rela.tions'�ip between Planning Board and the Board of Appeals <br /> r-egarding special permits and the procedures for obta-fining perra2t s <br /> for uses and reduces the size of commercial develop.tents requ-iring <br /> Planning Board approval from 25 , 000 square f oat of i first f loom ar W a <br /> to i0 , 0oo square feet of gross floor area which is the '.eve-1 <br /> considered a Development of regional impact under the Cape 'od <br /> Commission Act . <br /> There were no Board comments . <br /> Mr . Mollov asked why that came about . <br /> Tony e�pla4..ned that now the bylaws having to do with corl a per cJ al <br /> development need cleaning up. it is not creating any new uses . <br /> Tort explained that there are a Lew big commisnt c�ay project ccM-31-r."U un <br /> and the Town does not have a spec .� c b-%Z -zw for d.:,.ra' J z-,g t h a <br /> ■ <br /> shopping cent er. There is also Confusion in al spe: i <br /> permit bvla;�r which were :lear ed up. oTq smaller pi o f acts 1''] Come <br /> to the Plannlna Board and it is now consistent wi th L1.6 gape mod <br /> Commission Act. <br /> A member of the public asked whv not have both Plan-t-1i ng Poarrd and <br /> ZBA rev . w why are you taking a step of due process a.wa':? <br /> �- r=; }1-at no procedural steps are e �- �� away.. ; -,�.L <br /> Tort s t�,��.� _ b i_3g given a..a y. 2ils I a a d <br /> of SBA it :;21 1 be the Planning Board after io , o0o sq. feet. <br /> It has the 1--Inan3mous suppGrt of t��eBii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.