My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/02/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
11/02/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:59:10 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 2:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts o2649 <br />Ms. Waygan called for Public Comment on this matter. <br />Nancy Ferreira- She came for the Public Hearing tonight regarding her second home, as she <br />is a full time resident of Brockton. She would like clarification on the open space and square <br />footage. They abut that little corner near lot 47. The reason they bought this house is because <br />they plan to retire here and purchased a property surrounded by beautiful woods. She loves to <br />walk down Tudor Terrace and now all those trees will be gone. Her home is off of Saxony <br />Drive. She would like more clarification on how many trees will be coming down. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated the credit easement is more like 80s.f. but he is estimating this based on <br />scale. At its narrowest point measures 60s.f. of credit easement. <br />Mr. Pesce clarified it would be 75 feet +/-, but against their lot it is an even further distance. He <br />measured and that corner to her lot, the closest point is 180 feet at an angle. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if she was concerned about the visual impact. <br />The project proponent commented he wants to have more open space which is why he is <br />doing a cluster. The lots are smaller to preserve more open space and the lots are deep with <br />the homes situated more at the front of the lots. He only clears 30 feet from the back of the <br />house, and he will leave the rest. <br />Ms. Waygan thinks there is a condition in the 1989 decision that talks about limiting the size of <br />lawns to 1,000s.f. so that will help. She inquired if there was something in the plan about clear <br />cutting lots. She noted it would be nice if there was a prohibition of clearing that would run with <br />the land onto the future property owners. With the water quality crisis in town, any preserved <br />tree does us good. <br />Steve Ferreira- His wife just spoke. He referenced the sections of lots in yellow as being the <br />original lots. In 1989 the Planning Board at that time made those three lots buildable with <br />correct frontage. Now here we are talking about chopping that up. When he and his wife <br />bought their house the motivating factor was the woods. To him, 87 feet is not enough. He <br />would invite anyone to come look at the yard, what is there, and what is at risk. The value of <br />his property will decrease. He inquired about the 6 acre lot they are calling 20 Tudor Terrace, <br />his assumption was it was town owned land. He heard someone bought that 6 acres. They <br />must've known it was not buildable because it didn't meet the 150ft. requirements for frontage. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated the lot in question was not buildable and only limited by access. At the time <br />of the original approval 20 Tudor Terrace was not owned but acquired thereafter. The property <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.