My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/02/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
11/02/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:59:10 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 2:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M <br />16 Great Neck Road North <br />.7vNashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />concerns over pollutants/nutrients in waterways. It looks as though it's being minimized. It was <br />more than a concern but a state of alarm. He looks back at the 1998 LCP document, and there <br />were two chapters about coastline and water quality. Those two topics make up close to 100 <br />pages of information pertaining to water quality. From 1998 until now, water has not improved. <br />He is hopeful when the LCP comes together this one little bullet of concern is expanded. <br />Lynne Barbee- She was glad to hear about ancient ways, she lives near one and it may seem <br />like a minor pathway, but it's a significant part of the town's history. At all the workshops she <br />attended people talked about small town character and wanting to keep that. There are issues <br />about development and re -development but people talked a lot about maintaining small town <br />character in these workshops. She looks forward to the last virtual meeting as well as the <br />survey and will do whatever she can to move forward. <br />Marge Hecht- She noted in looking at the takeaways, one glaring omission was in keeping <br />Mashpee's small town character as well as limits on development. <br />Anne Malone- She reviewed takeaways from the workshops. All sessions pronounced <br />concern about the fragility and ill health of waterways and the legacy of development. Items <br />such as sewer, better town management, preference to environmental health, and valuing the <br />remains of rural character is what makes the community one people want to support. <br />Mr. Lehrer clarified for everyone that this was just an operational document to consider <br />actions. Any omission shouldn't be construed as a key takeaway. <br />Ms. Waygan would like to note what session these came from and add a date, she would also <br />like this to be marked as a draft. <br />Mr. Fulone stated there is a page and a half on water and wildlife. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if the charts were on the LCP webpage. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated the key takeaways were drafted for thinking purposes and are being <br />misconstrued as proponents for the vision. Also, he would rather work on the vision sooner <br />rather than later. <br />Mr. Richardson asked when this information will be shared with the Select Board and Finance <br />Committee. In looking at this list, items are repeated from the previous LCP that haven't been <br />addressed and will cost a lot of money to accomplish. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.