Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Waygan doesn't have the Zoning Bylaw from back then <br />asked what the frontage requirement was back then. <br />16 Great Neck Road North <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />She noted it was a cluster and <br />Mr. Lehrer can confirm this was a cluster and noted a couple differences between today and <br />the early inception. For decades it was prescriptive with dimension and lot sizes, while in <br />todays 2022 Zoning Bylaw, the Planning Board has discretion of dimensional criteria. <br />Mr. Kirrane stated the lots are smaller in the R5 and they require 80,000 s.f., the dimensional <br />requirements are reduced to not give up open space and things of that nature. <br />Ms. Waygan thought she read that the Planning Board could rule that any parcel of 5 acres or <br />more, no subdivision may be approved except pursuant to special permit cluster under this <br />section. Rules and regulations say it has to be made under current zoning, any new land being <br />subdivided for a parcel of 5 acres or more, no subdivision in a residential zone may be perused <br />except through 147-46. It states the Planning Board may waive upon written request from the <br />applicant. <br />Mr. Lehrer commented these items under the land space table state minimum setbacks, lot <br />coverage, and building height. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if it was R5, and if so, the minimum frontage is 150ft., unless approved on <br />the Planning Board's discretion, the Board can make an exception. <br />Mr. Kirrane read provision 9.4 from 1989, stating the Planning Board may approve a special <br />permit of 10 acres or more, lots do not conform, and frontage setbacks, provided the Planning <br />Board makes a finding that the public good is served. Nine criteria's were listed and one states <br />the lots have to be at least 15,000s.f. <br />Mr. Balzarini noted the turning radius was done in 1989 and fire trucks got bigger, he is curious <br />if the radius is still enough for current fire trucks. <br />Mr. Kirrane did not submit plans to the Fire Department. <br />Mr. Dibb stated the current design is per current regulations. <br />Ms. Waygan would like that confirmed with the Fire Department. <br />Mr. Pesce stated the recent plan submitted is what is being proposed. He recently saw the <br />cover letter, and there was a lot of information coming to the Boards attention to consume in a <br />3 <br />