My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/02/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
11/02/2022 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:59:10 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 2:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/02/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road North <br />-Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />and preserved 17.153 acres of open space. The applicant seeks to <br />modify the special permit decision to incorporate the additional three <br />building lots proposed. <br />Mr. Pesce proposed they show the bedroom count per lot. He added there is some confusion <br />in the actual easement document, and the first page says bedrooms are restricted to 28 then <br />states 31. He would like that to be clearer. He would also like to know where the facility land <br />and nitrogen credit land is. <br />Ms. Waygan stated on the first page of restriction, 5th paragraph, credit land is 77,000 s.f. <br />The project proponent clarified the reference is to original plan that wasn't reflected on the new <br />plan and the 77,000 s.f. is the total parcel 2a. <br />Mr. Pesce is seeing lot 1 and lot 2 but no 2a, there is an oversight somewhere, or it could be <br />on another plan. He would like some documentation or proof. <br />Ms. Waygan would like something from the proponent regarding the 1989 Special Permit that <br />confirms that all the special conditions have been met. If they have not been met, she would <br />like to know what their plan is to meet them. They just passed a zoning bylaw about low impact <br />development and anything that can be done is encouraged for something like this. This could <br />mean rain gardens, vegetative swales for phosphorous pollution or storm water runoff etc., <br />would be appreciated. The minimum lot size is up to the Planning Board. There will be no <br />setback relief. It's her view that current zoning does apply, and with this plan being presented <br />tonight, she would like to know what they aren't meeting in the current cluster subdivision <br />zoning. The Planning Board could approve these lot sizes. In the 1989 Special Permit there <br />was talk about lot 47 being put aside as open space. This new lot 47 is a duplication of <br />numbers, she would like to make it clear, she would like to skip that and use 48, 49, and 50 <br />instead. If there is reference to any previous lots they should be renumbered this time around. <br />She also got confirmation there is no wetlands. <br />Mr. Balzarini asked about the map from 1989 with Wood Road and the dotted line, he is <br />curious if that is an ancient way. He also notes it goes through the middle of one of the lots. <br />Ms. Waygan stated Mr. Lehrer gave her the subdivision plan from 1989 and if it is an ancient <br />way they want to know so it can be preserved or know if it is isn't. <br />Mr. Kirrane commented at this stage it may be going through the middle of people's houses at <br />this point. <br />rA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.