Laserfiche WebLink
minute3/10/76 <br /> page 2 <br /> Appendix C i Fiscal Analysis <br /> Analyzed. Mesh eel tcax and expense situation cias core <br /> pared. to other p towns*@ Phil Mas 1 ee t a rate �r!- amount <br /> of expend-i 4dL�da s i s c mpa,rf�+1t i Y el to Y'�o the percentage of the total <br /> which mu be raised sed ;lh u �rw�, � R�i gh p poa.�°�.4�i � �� ,;Jive <br /> lack o 'income from other sources which other ape towns rem <br /> sews p particularly Stave Aid. <br /> A hypothetical impact of the school construction costs <br /> was given* Because Mazhpeells tax rate is low, any capital i � <br /> provement will make a, large percentage increase ea In the tax rate o <br /> but this is a, 11 c ra tchi p" process with other Cape towns. The <br /> study outlined- the possible impact of construction cost $4 mil- <br /> lion <br /> The educational per pupil is $1, 380 for 1975- 9 Thus: <br /> it takes 1 8,000 of assessment to pay for the education of one <br /> child,, <br /> Comments of Case Study <br /> IP <br /> o Bourgeois and- Mra, Sloane agreed with the re om-m <br /> ens r ion that one board- in town should- be charged. with spec" a.1 <br /> permit granting authority, and. that the board- which could. fill <br /> this position mo st favorably and efficiently would- be the P1 nua <br /> n:Lr.g Bo ard o The position would, also entail coord.inating reviews <br /> of the other town agencies which affect the granting of the per <br /> mi tth u use of the Joint Review Prose ( a.oksao Site Review Pro-.* <br /> s * NOTEt The Conservation Cor mi..S on can review a prelim <br /> inary plan before a Notice of intent is applied for. It would. <br /> be beneficia.1 for both the town and applicant to be informed. <br /> of the Commissionts rulings The special permit grantiong autho- <br /> ority would de to rrain the time sequence and procedure to b <br /> used-a The town could. test the J$R.P# with an inform .l process <br /> without a, b �l .w being necessar y s <br /> Extent of General Criteria, to be Considered in the Gra.nti'ng of <br /> Special Permits <br /> a, Pollution of surface or groundwater <br /> be Salt water intrusion <br /> co Darnage to fi8heries <br /> d-o Erosion by development <br /> e. Location and- d,esign of vehicular access <br /> f. Asthetic criteri 8, <br /> By-mlaws could. be passed. to "strengthen the town' s posi- <br /> t i o n o such as a by-law statings where a, side road. exists, it <br /> must be used. for access to a, proposed d.evelopment rather r than <br />