My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/10/1976 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
03/10/1976 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2023 5:03:36 PM
Creation date
1/4/2023 9:36:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes 3/10/7 <br /> p age <br /> 3 <br /> Future Industrial Growth <br /> i- <br /> f <br /> Given the facts that 10,shpee is ) between two major <br /> shopping areas, ) between two highly organized Indust i'all - <br /> dsvelo ed, towns tind ) lacking in supportive water and. trans- <br /> portation systems, the industrial groth of Mashpee will likely <br /> be restricted in the next eight years* Mro Bourgeois feels <br /> Mash pee should. prepare for the overflow from Falmouth and H anniso <br /> Zoning Around. Water Bodies <br /> The case study recommends ends creation o a wetlands zone <br /> consisting of approximately 19 000 foot ( arbitrary) boundary <br /> round the great ponds, with a minimum tot requirement of <br /> 0 t OOO s o . A morepeci i boundary would. consider the prew, <br /> sent level of d_eve l o rent around the v ond. q land holding pat- <br /> terns, <br /> s and water f low& Mr a Sloane recommend.ed. the <br /> wetlands zoning include all ponds, bays c@ d. rivers and. the <br /> ill be wl <br /> included in the final draft of the study. <br /> n ord-er to further protect the wetlands, the option <br /> of bonus zoning would h vail bl o bonus o in o1aw <br /> must be specificas t�/��yy <br /> what amenities are mandatoryp such a <br /> setback requirementse An applIcant who wishes she s to use bonus <br /> zoning to increase density would have to meet certain re- <br /> quiLrements stated, in the by-,law and, go thru the Joint Rev3lew <br /> Process to receive a. special permit'. <br /> .estheticBy-law <br /> This has been done in Brno line and. Chulms o d and- <br /> should- he considered. in Mashes e since South Cape Beach is being <br /> planned. as a State Park end, she will want to retain i is <br /> sth ti quality. Enforcement comes thru wi thho ld.in o the <br /> Certificate of Zoningo <br /> Build.ing Permit Safety lause <br /> The final draft of the study will in l.ude a recommended <br /> safety clause fo r the casein which a building permit has been <br /> issued imrop r*l , due to an error in the site plan or li ant" s <br /> faJ-1ure to meet an Order of Conditions for a special rmit. <br /> Meeting Scheduled. <br /> The Planning Boar will meet Wednesday., March 1 and. <br /> review the se Study in depth, akin notes in themargin of <br /> o to be delivered- to Ms. Brown in Boston. <br /> The meeting adjourned, at 11 00o <br /> Deirdre Greelish <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.