My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/19/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
04/19/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:36:55 PM
Creation date
6/9/2023 2:12:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/19/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck R.oadWorth <br />Mashpee, Massachusetts o2649 <br />Ms. Faulkner felt positive about the project last time it was presented and she is thrilled about <br />the water quality and the reconstruction of the bogs. She would like to further modifications. <br />She agrees with Mr. Balzarini regarding proximity of the units, the last place seems squished. <br />She asked if they anticipated seasonal use of these units. <br />Mr. McElhinney stated that is generally what happens, about 30% will be year round and the <br />bulk would be seasonal months April — November. <br />Mr. Fulone likes this project and thinks the proponent did a nice job addressing issues that <br />came forth and he isn't hard on the buffer discrepancy but he would be willing to look between <br />40ft.-100ft. as well. <br />Mr. McElhinney stated if they do not get this across the finish line before the election they will <br />have to start over. They need to make more changes, and given the time frame they would <br />appreciate as much direction as the Board can give. If he can provide the Board evidence of <br />the 100ft. being waived, or is the Board open to consider more than 40ft. but less than 100ft.? <br />With 100ft. he can confidently say it would not work. <br />Ms. Waygan stated this new land is part of the bylaw, its 1985 zoning. The benefit they get <br />from using 1985 zoning is huge. There are wetlands all around the site. She wants to hear <br />from Conservation before she makes a decision on this. It is a sensitive site flowing down into <br />a very sensitive environment. This is going to improve the environment. <br />Mr. McElhinney stated this puts them in a difficult position when they have to guess what might <br />satisfy a layperson on fire safety when they already got the okay from the Fire Department. <br />Mr. Pesce added that he consults with two other towns and he has seen both sides, the <br />developer with best use and benefit to the town coupled with compliance to zoning. If there are <br />waivers there has to be a balance. It is up to the proponent to come up with that balance. We <br />owe it to Mr. McElhinney to ask the Board about middle ground between 40ft -100ft. He needs <br />to be able to walk away to think with his team how to approach this ask. <br />Mr. McElhinney reiterated they are doing something creative with water quality and they have <br />one meeting left so the more direction he can have the better. If this does not go through they <br />will be putting forth three separate single family homes. <br />MOTION: <br />Mr. Balzarini made a motion to continue this Public Hearing to May 3rd at 7:11 PM. <br />Seconded by Ms. Faulkner. <br />Roll Call: <br />Ms. Faulkner: Yes, Mr. Balzarini: Yes, Mr. Fulone: Yes, Ms. Waygan: Yes <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.