My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/17/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
05/17/2023 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:37:54 PM
Creation date
6/9/2023 3:11:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/17/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16 Great Neck Road North <br />Nashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br />Mr. Lehrer stated there were few items on the tripartite. These included sidewalk modification, <br />traffic radar signage, and paving to be completed, then the tripartite would go away. <br />Depending on the scope of what gets completed, there may not necessitate continued <br />security. Prior to the lapse he would still like a draft ready. <br />Ms. Waygan commented that the basic language doesn't have to change but the dates of <br />conditions do. She needs the dates and would like them by May 26t" so it can go into the <br />packet for June 7t". This will include dates of completion for the subdivision. <br />Mr. Morin needs time to consider and communicate with his legal team and Mr. Lehrer. <br />Mr. Lehrer commented that the Special Permit has a condition and through the assembly of <br />the HOA, does he still maintain obligation? Did the maintenance meet conditions of the permit? <br />It's for infrastructure, road utilities, landscaping, road monuments, and a radar sign. All <br />outstanding items were listed and paving Carriage and Blue Castle Drive was the majority of <br />the money secured. The Special Permit does not secure the tripartite, it's an ongoing <br />maintenance the developer would lose when the subdivision gets handed over to the HOA. <br />Mr. Morin respects the request but it isn't up until July so he will be in contact with Mr. Lehrer. <br />He will also try to get the request for modification of the Special Permit. <br />Ms. Faulkner needs a summation of this entire project. Mr. Lehrer offered to take her on a tour. <br />Planning for October 2023 Town Meeting — Discuss Draft Articles <br />Floodplain Overlay- Fill Prohibition <br />Mr. Lehrer stated this is for the prohibition of fill when raising elevation. Fill for a septic is <br />exempt. Language is consistent with what was seen before, but the purpose is to encourage <br />and require safer options in the event of a flood. Using fill to raise elevation and building atop <br />that fill and having the first floor out of flood zone is the least flood safe option. Having a solid <br />wall with flood vents is recommended. It recognizes the BOH requiring IA in the floodplain. <br />Certain types of systems mitigate necessity for fill. There is nothing about this bylaw that <br />restricts someone to properly dispose of wastewater. There are exceptions here. Any material <br />required for installation of a board approved system is not fill as regulated. Mr. Lehrer noted <br />the Health Agent has seen this draft but not the entirety of the Board of Health. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if anyone else should review this, like the Building Commissioner, Board of <br />Appeals, and ConCom. The Planning Board is voting on June 7t". She would also like this sent <br />to John Cotton. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.