My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/20/2024 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
03/20/2024 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:28:51 PM
Creation date
4/10/2024 10:10:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/20/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
apof MAS�Fe <br />INC. IBIN <br />n <br />�AOTamnw M�� <br />16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />wlashyee, _Massachusetts o2649 <br />if you look at these materials, they are right there minus two units. As Building Commissioner, <br />is unit count in this special permit going to be the end game for you? <br />Mr. Morris commented that it needs to be made clear. <br />Ms. Waygan stated there are 273 units, because one property purchased two development <br />rights, and the cap is 287. With these 12 approved, they have two more units under the special <br />permit. If those two last units get built, as Building Commissioner, are you going to issue more <br />permits after the number of units are reached? Is that condition enough to stop issuing permits <br />once the number of units is reached? <br />Mr. Lehrer clarified Ms. Waygan's question, if Willowbend were to build out their final units to <br />287, if someone were to submit a permit for a 288t" unit, would he feel entitled to grant? <br />Mr. Morris thinks they can eat the last two permits without a problem. <br />Mr. Eddy thinks it's an unfair question because for there to be a unit, there needs to be an <br />approved site plan that he would know about, a place for that house to land. <br />Mr. Balzarini stated he would like to see the $90,000 rounded up to $100,000. Ms. Faulkner <br />asked Troy Miller if that was acceptable, he agreed to the ask. <br />Wendy Williams- She needs to talk about the issue of the 12 lots that have yet to be built on. <br />It's not the town's problem to make that up to the property owner. She understands why they <br />want people to get their homes. Under most circumstances she would agree, but the problem <br />is not the fault with the town, its that Willowbend sold these lots under false pretenses. <br />Willowbend didn't tell them they were already over their bedroom limit. It is up to them to go <br />back to those property owners and find a way to make good. We shouldn't have to absorb any <br />more environmental degradation. The other thing she normally wouldn't bring up, but they are <br />misrepresenting what the Conservation said about these bogs. The Conservation Department <br />wants to see the entire bog fixed, not just tiny pieces. It would then be a fair trade to let these <br />people have 12 units on this land in return for fixing the entirety of bog, 5 acres of Quaker Run <br />is nothing, it's a mess right now, it's not enough. These people are giving us small potatoes, <br />nickel and diming. A half -acre for one low-income house does not compensate for filling 4 <br />acres with 12 condos that are going to further ruin our waters. Look at trees coming down, <br />pavement, and runoff from cars that flow into the bay. It is hard to believe we are still here <br />talking about this. She read over their PR material about how they are so community oriented. <br />Conversations have been going on for a year, they are making a big ask. When you come up <br />with a big ask you need to come up with a big offer in return. Trades we are talking about here <br />shouldn't be about bedroom limit, it should be about if they should even be able to build12 <br />units on the shoreline. Willowbend has four big problems, they are well over bedroom limit set <br />by special permit, they threatened to sue the town, why trust to build future developments? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.