Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />-Mashpee, -Massachusetts 02649 <br />Ms. Waygan would need to look at the website, Special Permit Modification # 27 is on the <br />website, she doesn't think this is relevant to this modification. Finding b. will be struck. <br />Ms. Faulkner went on with the current open space. <br />Mr. Lehrer stated the Board needs to continue to establish that this project isn't going away <br />from special permit. <br />Ms. Waygan commented 1985 zoning is part of public record, she would have to look at the <br />public record for the special permit as amended. That will have to wait until next time. She <br />doesn't have those materials and paper right now. <br />Ms. Faulkner does not know what special permit would have allowed in 1987. Under the 1985 <br />Special Permit the project was permitted for 338, in 1991 it reduced units to 287. This Board <br />finds the max approved permissible units to be 287. <br />Ms. Waygan stated in 1987 it was 338 units, that is correct. Ms. Waygan will confirm the 341 <br />original units before 1991. Wordage was changed to remove the word increased because it <br />was confusing. <br />Ms. Faulkner read aloud the bedroom count projected by Town Planner in August 2023, and <br />confirmed by Ms. Waygan to be 855. <br />Ms. Waygan thinks it should end, strike from Finding d. the new series of conditions, and those <br />will go to Section 5 for the piece on mitigations on page 6 under C. <br />Ms. Waygan will not vote in favor of compliance with Chapter 40a because it does not comply <br />with zoning bylaws. She cannot say this will not have sufficient adverse impacts on wildlife or <br />destroy or disturb archeological sites. She doesn't think it can be found compliant because it's <br />not consistent with regulations, specifically the Flow Neutral Bylaw. She cannot find that the <br />project will not destroy or disturb sites, so she tried to keep it open for research. She can't <br />support those conditions; they are not strong enough. You guys can say this language is fine, <br />but she will not vote for it. <br />She continued that it is not in compliance with state and town regulations, Flow Neutral Bylaw <br />is a regulation. In Section 108, the flows are capped at 15-22 bedrooms,1 bedroom for 10,000 <br />sq. ft. If you add in wetlands and upland that's 22 bedrooms, they have proposed 36-48, which <br />is not consistent with FNB and is not allowed. <br />Ms. Faulkner moved on to H, the Board finds Mashpee Flow Neutral Bylaw limits present and <br />future flows permitted as of July 1, 2015, Chapter 108, one bedroom for 10,000sq. ft. for <br />10 <br />