Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />-lashpee, -Massachusetts 02649 <br />multifamily projects, such as Cranberry Point. Willowbend would be 26 bedrooms over the <br />limit. <br />Ms. Waygan would like to note that the 22-bedroom count to be correct. The use of without <br />relief implies this is allowed with relief, it's not. We might let them make the decision and then <br />vote against it. This is a town regulation, we heard testimony saying it needs to be tweaked. <br />This is the law of the land we have now. It was reviewed by Town Counsel, voted on and went <br />to the AG. It's dysfunctional, but they can't negate because they don't like it. <br />Ms. Faulkner noted five members said "no" for F. If something doesn't apply say does not <br />apply. We need to respond to each and every one of those special permit conditions. Under G, <br />the original 1987 Special Permit is conditioned to a minimum edge buffer of 100 ft. left in <br />existing entrance areas and golf course areas. There was a site plan submitted for a 65ft. <br />buffer between the first condo and the edge of Quinaquisset, which is less than the 100ft. <br />requirement. <br />Ms. Waygan would say everything is right, keep as is. The buffer strip is equal to the entire <br />perimeter of the parcel. She will look up dimensional requirements. Ms. Waygan looked it up, <br />everything in G is fine. <br />Ms. Faulkner thinks that the flow neutral is poorly written. <br />Ms. Waygan stated the purpose and intent clarifies everything but the rules and regulations of <br />enforcing it need to be put into the bylaw. <br />Ms. Faulkner moved onto I, everyone said it looked good. She went on to J, the forebay will <br />collect runoff of Quinaquisset Bay, everyone is in favor of it. Under K, the submitted plan with <br />the Consulting Engineer's written responses on three dates, the Board accepts <br />recommendation of Board engineer and comments are satisfactorily addressed. <br />Ms. Waygan would like a condition added that final plans are approved by the Board Engineer. <br />We cannot approve them because we closed the Public Hearing, but we delegate to the Town <br />Engineer and make it a condition the final plans are approved by Ed Pesce. <br />Ms. Faulknerwent on to L, and it was stated would need to be followed up with a condition. M <br />is Conservation, a correct statement everyone agreed. N contemplates subject parcel in <br />conservation and will require review by Conservation. The project is exempt from the <br />requirements of the Tree Bylaw, due to no jurisdiction in conservation. O states that the <br />Planning Board finds proposal will not adversely affect public health or safety and will not <br />cause excessive demands on community facilities and will not significantly decrease <br />groundwater or air quality. <br />11 <br />