Laserfiche WebLink
16 Great Neck RoadNorth <br />-Mashpee, -Massachusetts 02649 <br />58 Red Brook Road and 23, 29, 41 and 47 Great Oak Road comprised of <br />318,064 square feet into 7 new building lots ranging in size between <br />15,016 s.f. and 17,083 s.f. The Applicant proposes that the Planning <br />Board authorize minimum lot sizes of 10,000 s.f. with 15-foot side and rear <br />setbacks with 40-foot front setbacks while preserving 181,266 s.f. as <br />protected open space (57% of total land area). <br />Mr. Richardson recused himself from the Public Hearing. Robert Hansen has been seated on <br />this matter. <br />7:15PM (Continued from May 15, 2024) <br />Applicant: New Seabury Homes, LLC <br />Location: Off the western sideline of Great Oak Road between Red Brook Road and <br />Sipps Road and identified as Map 110: Parcels 58, 59, 80, 82, 83, and 97 <br />Request: Applicant requests approval of a Definitive Subdivision Plan of land that <br />would divide six (6) parcels into seven (7) building lots off the Great Oak <br />Road and Red Brook Road. The properties are identified on Mashpee's <br />Assessor's Map 110 Parcels 58, 59, 80, 82, 83 and 97 and which are <br />addressed as 52 and 58 Red Brook Road and 23, 29, 41 and 47 Great <br />Oak Road. The submitted plan proposes to create lots that are between <br />15,016 s.f. and 17,083 s.f. in size and proposes to protect 181,266 s.f. of <br />land as open space. The lots proposed would be accessed by a cul-de- <br />sac road called Osprey Court. <br />Brian Yergatian is here representing the applicant. He is accompanied by Nick Galanis from <br />New Seabury homes and Attorney Rob Mills. They did receive the questions submitted by the <br />Board, they are not presenting any new plans, everything remains as is. They would like to go <br />through the 11 questions and provide answers. <br />Update of PAL Archeological Survey: PAL completed the survey for historic value and did <br />not identify any archeological materials or features. They did not recommend any further <br />investigation. PAL informed the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, but he did not witness <br />anyone on site at the field evaluations. PAL will provide their report once it is submitted to the <br />state archeological office. <br />Ms. Waygan asked if it will come to this Board, it will be submitted to the Tribe, so it can be <br />submitted to this Board as well. <br />Traffic Calming at the Intersection: The applicant reached out to the DPW after the last <br />meeting. DPW reviewed improvements but it did not warrant concern. The intersection has a <br />low crash rate, adequate site distance, and two stop signs. <br />2 <br />