Laserfiche WebLink
MEETING MINUTES <br /> JANUARY 8, 2025 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> Ms. Romero, Board Secretary confirmed that the abutters were notified correctly, <br /> and do not require additional mailings regarding any continuances of the petition. <br /> It is up to the abutters to contact the Building Department for any questions relating <br /> to any continuances of petitions. <br /> Mr. Bonvie confirmed that the project is included in the Phase 2 Sewer Project, and <br /> agrees that an IA system is not required with this proposal. He also confirmed that <br /> a gravel driveway is "pervious", and has consulted with the Town Engineer who has <br /> confirmed that a gravel driveway is in fact "pervious". <br /> Attorney Kirrane mentioned that the lot area is under 2,500 sq. ft. of pervious <br /> surface, and does not require a Special Permit. He also mentioned that this comment <br /> was discussed at the last meeting. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked the Board if the Fire Chief comments can be added as a condition. <br /> The question is if that condition can be stated in perpetuity. The Board agreed that <br /> this comment should be added as a condition. <br /> Mr. Bonvie also mentioned that the drainage calculations, and design criteria need <br /> to be added on all future site plans. The plan that was submitted and noted §174- <br /> 27.2 of the Zoning Bylaws. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked what method was performed for the drainage calculations. <br /> Mr. Brian Wallace, with JC Engineering made a comment that he did not perform <br /> drainage calculations for the site. However, the plan noted the placement of drywells <br /> to be installed. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked that the drainage calculations need to be submitted to the Building <br /> Commissioner, and he can communicate that when they are received. <br /> Mr. Furbush mentioned that the comment in A.M. Wilson's letter regarding the 50 <br /> ft. setback to the wetlands being a moot point because the existing dwelling has a <br /> condition that is considered pre-existing, nonconforming. He asked Attorney Kirrane <br /> to review the other comments mentioned in the A.M. Wilson letter. <br /> Mr. Bonvie would have preferred that the revised plan have the existing and <br /> proposed information depicted on the site plan. <br /> Attorney Kirrane presented the historical information of the neighborhood that was <br /> included in the letter he provided to the Board. The road that was created back in <br /> 1963 is not within the layout of the Daniel's property. He also said that the deed <br /> gives his client the right to access Ned Besse Road, and also has the right to repair <br /> and maintain his property. <br /> 3 <br />