My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/10/2000 SELECT BOARD Minutes
>
10/10/2000 SELECT BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2025 5:05:41 PM
Creation date
3/31/2025 1:47:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SELECT BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Selectmen <br /> Minutes—Verbatim <br /> October 10, 2000 <br /> Selectman Marsters: It doesn't allow us to participate in the process...And you boys can <br /> participate, I respect you for that, you have already said that. And <br /> I think we should let our people, our congressmen, our <br /> representatives, our senators know that we are not in favor of this <br /> bill. And, it wouldn't be bad just to send somebody down there <br /> just to keep an eye on it to see what is going on. And shame on <br /> Hale and Dorr, yes, I did not get this information from Hale and <br /> Darr,this came from a source that was in Connecticut so I just <br /> want to make that clear. <br /> Selectman Cahalane: ....It seems that we should use the same lawyer that the five towns <br /> in Connecticut are using, Perkins and Cole. <br /> Selectman Leveille: ...I just want to make a few things clear...First of all,...you said a <br /> lobbyist wouldn't have a job to do. That's not really true, a <br /> lobbyist would be our voice. That's what a lobbyist does. He is <br /> our voice because he has access to people and to areas to which we <br /> do not have access...I also support Ken, in the fact we should go <br /> ahead with a lobbyist on these two bills, I also think we should in <br /> good faith, send a letter to the Tribal Council asking them for a <br /> documented copy of the petition filed to the BIA,the entire <br /> document for full disclosure purposes as Ken was talking about. <br /> ...If they are not forthcoming with the actual document and map <br /> and so forth, then I think we should go to our attorneys... and ask <br /> them to use all of their legal means to go to the BIA under the <br /> Freedom of Information Act to get whatever information we need. <br /> Selectman Cahalan: ...When Wayne and I met with Glenn Marshall, at the table, Glenn <br /> Marshall said that he did not care what lawyer we used...as long as <br /> it was not Hale and Dorr...I think that we should employ the <br /> Washington law firm of Perkins and Cole that is representing the <br /> Connecticut towns...They seem to know what they are doing, Hale <br /> and Dorr has not had an Indian suit since our Indian suit. They are <br /> expensive, they are probably even more expensive than Hale and <br /> Dorr—but I'd like to go in with a fresh outlook with someone that <br /> really knows what is going on, right now, especially... with this. <br /> Selectman Leveille: We would probably have to continue retain Hale and Dorr from a <br /> historical perspective. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.