My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/04/2004 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes (2)
>
02/04/2004 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 5:01:06 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:20:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/04/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 I <br /> -2- <br /> Design Review, February 4, 2004 <br /> Main parking area against Route 28 entrance is very close to Route 28 and dangerous. <br /> The corner must be kept open for visibility. Need site lines. <br /> Three parking spaces closest to entrance off route 28 will be dangerous. Maybe make <br /> those handicap spaces because they are not used as much. <br /> The committee feels that the extra building is making the site too tight and the one-way <br /> exit will be a disaster. The separate building is an issue in that True Value customers will <br /> park in their spaces. <br /> A side yard variance is required from Shellback for the independent building, which may <br /> not get through the Board of Appeals because of a need to show a hardship. <br /> The committee suggests that they lose the independent building and be sure the site lines <br /> are good in and out of Route 28. The bank is lower than Route 28 and upper road at True <br /> Value, which makes it hard to exit project going up hill. <br /> The committee suggests that they flip the site plan so the new building moves south and <br /> integrates with Deer Crossing and move the bank addition.to North side so the entire <br /> corner is bank. <br /> They are to return with a new site plan. <br /> The sign will require a variance from the Board of Appeals. This Committee approves <br /> the signage but issue with the back lit portion. <br /> 129 Industrial Drive <br /> Mike Carney for Kim and Fran Silva <br /> The original plan for Gary Tavares was 100 by 40,the new plans with Cape Cod Builders <br /> is 180 x 55. Our by-law states that land abutting residential must have a 50-foot natural <br /> buffer. Jack Landers Cauley, Engineer needs to read the by-laws and resubmit plan. At <br /> this time does not conform. <br /> From grading point of view the building is at elevation 42, Great Hay Road behind is at <br /> elevation 31. The committee wants to see a cross section from Great Hay Road. The <br /> building appears high relative to residential area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.