Laserfiche WebLink
Site Plan and Landscape Review <br /> Boat Storage and Maintenance Building <br /> Wags Road <br /> Kevin Kirrane <br /> Kevin Kirrane appeared and was given the signed letter from Design Review dated July 20, 2004, which is in <br /> response to his July 13 letter to Design Review. Copies of these 2 letters are attached to printed set of these <br /> minutes. During the discussion period that followed Kevin asked whether or not Design Review would send <br /> copy of their July 20 letter to the Board of Appeals. Waiter responded that they would, as well as providing a <br /> copy to the other Boards. <br /> The project was again discussed. Walter again emphasized that Design Review would like to work with them <br /> and that 3 Design Review Trustees and site engineer went out to the site and walked the area. They spent 2 <br /> hours there. <br /> Design Review informed Kevin that they had a brief discussion with Chief Baker just prior to the start of this <br /> meeting and that the Chief will be preparing a letter on the fire issues, etc. In addition,the Chief advised that he <br /> spoke with their consultant and the Chief thinks the consultant is going to state 10' buffer,but consultant also <br /> specifies a minimum of 3 to 6 feet spacing between boats, spacing determined by size of boat. However, Chief <br /> Baker still has not received written report from consultant,which he expected to receive by now. <br /> Summarizing, the two really big issues are buffer requirements and working with Fire Chief on fire <br /> requirements. Following are some of the main issues still to be addressed: <br /> • Topography in the field does not match Engineering Plan. <br /> • In Plan to be submitted designate parking space for boats. <br /> • Bring retaining walls inside buffer. <br /> • If storing boats inside(Kevin thinks they will)then Chief Baker to be informed so they meet fire <br /> requirements. <br /> Kevin said he would notify Applicant. He said that he went to ZBA to seek variance on buffer,but he has no <br /> intention of going forward unless fire issues are resolved. <br /> Conclusion: Design Review recommendation to all other Town Boards of Plans submitted to date would <br /> be not to approve the project. Also if Applicant does a re-design their Plan should match topography in <br /> the field and they should meet fire requirements, <br /> Adjournment...Meeting was adjourned at 9:20 a.m. <br /> spectfully submitted, <br /> can Giliberti <br /> Recording Secretary <br /> 7 <br />