Laserfiche WebLink
Site Plan and Landsca a Review <br /> 334 Main Street <br /> McShane Construction <br /> Kevin Kirrane. <br /> Attorney Kevin Kirrane opened the discussion by saying Steven Hayes would present the proposed PIans. Also <br /> in attendance were John McShane, Glenn DuMont and Christopher Kirrane. Steven Hayes began by stating the <br /> submitted Plans dealt with all concerns and, in particular, he noted; <br /> • Current elevation of Building#1 <br /> Coordinated grading Plan <br /> • Reduced height of Building#1 by almost 10 feet. <br /> • For Building#2 they will have to come back with tenant requirements when these are know <br /> • Building#2 came down almost 7 feet with revised approach. <br /> The consensus of the Design Review Committee was that what was presented looks a lot better than what was <br /> discussed at the March 3 meeting. <br /> Conclusion. Proposed Plan stamped approved <br /> Discussion <br /> addressed the Committee stating that a procedure should be established so that applicants are informed <br /> Walteraddre g p pP <br /> as to which Board they should address first—for example, perhaps it should be they first go before Design <br /> Review,then to Plan Review, etc. The consensus by Design Review Committee was that all the.Boards should <br /> review this topic so that a procedure can be established. <br /> At this point Tom Fudala and Pat White joined the discussion. Tom distributed copies of two drafts: <br /> 1. Special Permit Process; and <br /> 2. Which Board Issues What Special Permits. <br /> Tom asked that these drafts not be circulated since he first has to have them reviewed by others, including Town <br /> Counsel. <br /> There was a detailed discussion on various aspects of the procedure and/or lack of procedure. Some of the <br /> highlights: <br /> • Consider major projects being presented at joint committee meetings. <br /> • Perhaps try Design Review/Plan Review joint meeting. What time? <br /> • Prepare some type of summary sheet informing applicants of steps and requirements in the process. <br /> • Form could be a"check sheet" for applicant to know where they have to appear and it could also be used <br /> as a"sign-off' sheet that they have appeared. <br /> • Walter suggested instead of requiring 16 copies of 24 X 36 size Plan that 2 or 3 be 24 X 36 and rest be <br /> 8-1/2 X 11. Tom agreed that this was a good point. <br /> • If application submitted is incomplete, why accept it as an application? <br />