My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/26/2007 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
>
04/26/2007 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 5:02:08 PM
Creation date
4/1/2025 3:23:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/26/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Design Review Committee <br /> Minutes of Meeting Held Thursday,April 26,2007 <br /> Mashpee Town Hall Meeting Room 3 <br /> Committee Members Present: Thomas O'Hara, Robert Nelson,Tom Jalowy, Lee Gurney, and Richard Stevens. <br /> i <br /> Summary <br /> • Olympia Sports—Design Review agreed with placing store name on entrance doors, but not on the windows. <br /> Sign proposed with lettering white with red approved. Final Plan to be sent to Building Department for Design <br /> Review review and approval. <br /> • Salon 151 —Existing sign that had been moved from old location Stamped Approved. Also Approved prior <br /> request for new signage in the event they use the previously requested new signage later on. <br /> • Breakaway at Trinity Place—Not Approved, <br /> Dunkin Donuts,40 South Street-Approved 20 square feet total signage as proposed. <br /> • Duck Pond-Building 2 Plan stamped approved. <br /> Thomas O'Hara, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m.. <br /> Sims <br /> Olympia Sports <br /> 11 Commercial Street <br /> Neokrafft Sims Inc., Peter MgWhy <br /> Peter Murphy of Neokraft Signs appeared and gave a very nice presentation of the proposed signage. Since backlighting <br /> of the sign was proposed, Design Review informed Mr. Murphy that back-lit signage was not allowed by by-law except if <br /> Board of Appeals permitted it. Mr. Murphy said they would not go the Appeals route and, instead, would do external <br /> illumination. Mr. Murphy was also informed that any window signage would have to be included as part of the 20 square <br /> feet signage allowed. <br /> Conclusion: Design Review agreed with placing store name on entrance doors,but not on the windows. Sign <br /> proposed with lettering white with red approved. Final Plan to be sent to Building Department for Design Review <br /> review and approval. <br /> Salon 151 <br /> 439 Nathan Ellis Highway <br /> Unit#3 <br /> John Lacava addressed the Committee saying that Salon 151 did not have an approved sign for their new location;they <br /> thought they could just move sign from the old location since it had been approved for the old location. He showed photo <br /> of the moved sign and also photo of new, approved sign. Design Review commented that the signage for the new location <br /> that had been approved but not used is preferable to what they put up from their old location. Mr. Lacava agreed and said <br /> perhaps sometime in the future they would replace existing sign but right now$3,000 replacement cost is a factor. <br /> Conclusion: Existing sign that had been moved from old location Stamped Approved. Also approved prior <br /> request for new signage in the event they use the previously requested new signage later on. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.