Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> MINUTES July 28, 1986 SPECIAL MEETING <br /> one of our meetings and had just left the Planning Board he <br /> stated he had spent a considerable amount of time with them. <br /> Mr. Reardon quoted the By-Laws, Section 6.2, which read <br /> the Board iDf Appeals shall submit one copy to the Planning <br /> Board for .its review and comments. He stated this By-Law has <br /> only one reasonable interpretation and that it is the responsi- <br /> bility of the Board of Appeals to deliver plans to the Planning <br /> Board. Mr. Reardon stated the plans could be delivered to the <br /> box upstairs with a cover note. <br /> Mr. Reardon stated in talking to Mr. Makunas that 'Mr. <br /> Makunas was under the impression that the Planning Board would <br /> have had knowledge of what was going on, not by a formal deli- <br /> very of a Jet of plans, but in a general way, over several <br /> months. He stated the Board of Appeals was under the impression <br /> the Planning Board was -getting imput from the developer. <br /> Mr. Dubin stated condition one of the decision took the <br /> Planning Board of guard by the mention of dwelling units. Mr. <br /> Hanrahan stated the Board of Appeals has made it very clear in <br /> the course of deliberating this, that the number of dwellings <br /> could be adjusted. <br /> Mr. Dubin stated the density is a major concern of the <br /> Planning Board. He stated the Planning Board might take into <br /> account in the future and agree there should be more open space <br /> for, that number of residential units. Mr. Dubin stated there <br /> should be some open units just for the quality of life and peo- <br /> ple living there. <br /> Mr. Ferragamo stated the mixed residential is poorly written <br /> in our By-Laws and stated in addition to being typographically <br /> non-existent it is like a ghost By-Law. He stated what he feels <br /> the Board of Appeals had done is to define a starting point for <br /> the applicant to then design and engineer a project that will not <br /> exceed 100 units. Mr. Gerragamo stated he feels it is important <br /> to have an overview- -of the project and then set certain limita- <br /> tions and have the applicant perform technically to those limita- <br /> tions and review them as each step comes along. <br /> It is noted she Planning Board did present a document to <br /> be signed by the Board of Appeals. This document is attached to <br /> the end of these minutes. Mr. Dubin stated he does not feel the <br /> document is necessary at this time. Mr. Hanrahan stated he also <br /> feels this document is not necessary. <br /> Mr.. Dubin stated he is reiterating and stated the Planning <br /> Board did feel there was inadequate open space for a project of <br /> this scope and magnitude. He stated he would like to make it <br /> clear from the Plann ing Boards point of view, we are not used <br /> to approving things in this Zoning District, we are used to being <br /> able to ask for open space and see a fairly large precentage of <br /> it but would like to see a little more of the placement. <br />