Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> MINUTES July 28, 1986 SPECIAL °MMING <br /> Mr. Reardon stated a point needs to be clarified, the Town <br /> Planner is viewed to be synonymous with the Planning Board and <br /> stated he feels this is a problem that needs to be addressed. <br /> Mr. Dubin stated Section 6.2 of the By-Law is a new section and <br /> has never been addressed before. Mr. Reardon stated the Board <br /> of Appeals is under the impression if the information Is iven <br /> to the Town Planner then they are given to the Planning Board. <br /> Mr. Dubin stated the Planning Board saw the plan but did not <br /> review it in the context of the By-Law. He stated they looked <br /> at it primarily for road lay-out. <br /> Mr. Reardon reiterated in stating all cases involving a <br /> Special Permit site plans are to be delivered by the Board of <br /> Appeals to the Planning Board. <br /> Mr. Dubin stated he would like the Planning Board included <br /> in any future phasings. He stated what happens if in the--future <br /> the Planning Board offers its comment thatin the overplan the <br /> density is to great and that there is inadequate open space, <br /> will there be a basis for a modification of the overall Permit <br /> at that point. Mr. Reardon stated he did not think it -.could <br /> be done because the master plan has been improved. <br /> Mr. Reardon stated the Planning Board would be limited at <br /> this point in time in making any recommendations for changes of <br /> siting, buildings, road lay-outs, etc. <br /> Mr. Dubin stated the Planning Board as a whole approved <br /> the road lay-out and stated the lay-out of the buildings is fine. <br /> He stated what he personally finds objectionable is the volume <br /> of the parking and how it intrudes into the buffers. Mr. Dubin <br /> stated if there were less residential units presumably the park- <br /> ing would be a little bit smaller so there may be still be a <br /> little bit of room to increase the landscaping. <br /> Mr. Hanrahan stated he respectfully suggests in the Planning <br /> Boards deliberations and comments that they incorporate the idea <br /> that this is within a village concept and that it is a downtown <br /> planned urban area. <br /> Mr. Dubin stated he would like a little bit of green between <br /> the road and the parking. Mr. Hanrahan stated that could be <br /> brought out in the landscaping. Mr. Dubin stated it is the resi- <br /> dential units on the top of the buildings that has created the <br /> need for the parking and perhaps it is not critical to Fields <br /> Point to have every last unit and perhaps have a green belt around <br /> the area. <br /> Mr. Makunas stated there is a typographical error in the <br /> decision on Fields Point regarding condition number & Mr. <br /> Makunas motioned to replace condition number 2 in the decision <br /> granted to Fields Point Corporation to read: No more then 100 <br /> dwelling units will be built on the site. Each phase approval <br /> incorporating dwelling units will specify a permitted number of <br /> dwelling units per phase. No permits will be issued for dwell- <br /> ing units until the applicant has received approval from the <br />