09/03/2003 PLANNING BOARD Minutes

Home Browse Search

is another legal plan on record. He recommended Applicant go through the process . Don Myers stated his agreement with the previous speaker, stating he would find it difficult knowing there were two (2) legally valid plans on record for the same property. If the intent is stated, Applicant should proceed under the applicable Definitive Plan process, and that this matter does not meet ANR requirements . Steve Dolan expressed a tendency to agree stating that he would expect Applicant would want to clarify this matter. Whether the Board is legally required to sign the ANR plan is unclear to him at the moment . Mr. Aucoin stated that both he and his client have been intent on determining the best action to take in order to approve a plan within the client' s timeframe. He stated there have been numerous conversations with the Town Planner in order to do so. The Town Planner reiterated the Board has previously, on another matter, signed an ANR Plan over an existing subdivision, not requiring the definitive process based upon Town Counsel recommendation. If the proposed ANR Plan meets the frontage requirement, it cannot be denied. _—._ _The Consulting Engineer_ asked whether the frontage____ requirements are as they exist, or would street lines disturb the frontage should they be calculated into the plan. The Chairman suggested the Board take more time to decide this matter, as she is uncomfortable approving the plan as it exists . Mr. Aucoin made reference to time constraints, asking if the plan requires additional lines, would it be sufficient to submit at the next Planning Board Meeting. He requested the Board advise him in this regard. Dennis Balzarini stated he would be satisfied if the Applicant submitted a plan showing the roadways . He noted there is one owner for the majority of the property, suggesting an easement/permission be obtained from the owner of the front lot, if this is in fact the case . 4