Laserfiche WebLink
Jeff said it will depend on whether the town is doing 2, 3 or 4 facts sheets. Usually, one is <br /> produced at the time of the Needs Assessment, so people are aware of the general <br /> problem. <br /> A second one could be when the facilities plan is in its finial form and you are looking for <br /> town support for the project-at town meeting. <br /> The examples provided are good to look at and pick out the pieces you like. <br /> Nancy will get a proposal for 3 fact sheets and some material for the town's website. <br /> Tom would also like to have a discussion with Maxine about what she can do about <br /> making a video. <br /> Nancy said Falmouth is producing a video, with funding from a grant, explaining the <br /> nitrogen issue and how it can be addressed. Maybe each community could fund their <br /> own "tag along" piece to that. <br /> The design of the factsheet, is 4 pages, in either an 11 x 17 or 81/2 x 1.1 format. <br /> Tom said at this point, it is unclear how the town will be funding this (sewer system). <br /> Also, this project involves 4 other towns. <br /> Nancy said that is not a problem. The fact sheet should focus on the facts that are <br /> most beneficial to the Mashpee Sewer Commission . <br /> Tom envisions 3 fact sheets and adding Sewer Commission information to the town <br /> website. <br /> Nancy Farrell will get a revised proposal to the Sewer Commission for 3 fact sheets and <br /> website work. In the meantime, she will get the copy from the Capekeepers brochure <br /> to Tom. <br /> Tom asked for elaboration on task #5. <br /> Nancy explained, if funding the sewers goes to town meeting, they can work to <br /> educate the people who typically vote at town meeting-send them a letter and a <br /> brochure answering some anticipated arguments. They can put a database together <br /> of a targeted group of residents. <br /> Ann Bradshaw, Superintendent of Schools. <br /> Tom gave a history of the Mashpee High School treatment plant. it received a <br /> discharge permit in 1995, which expired in 2000 but the plant was operating under the <br /> original permit until last year. The new permit required an increase in the amount of <br /> monitoring and sampling to be done because the discharge area is in the Zone II for <br /> the Holland Mill well site, but the well does not exist. <br /> Based on the recommendation of United Water, the plant operator, they appealed to <br /> the State to redefine the delineation of the Zone II. It was accepted and a new draft <br /> discharge permit was issued. <br /> Ann Bradshaw explained the original design of the treatment plant was problematic <br /> from the start. It is designed for 18,000 gal per day but, at best , actual flow is 3000 <br /> gallons and it is intermittent. Therefore the plant doesn't run effectively or efficiently. <br />